Greetings sriram, ur post is absolutely true. I have been a member of this group ever since 2001 , and back in those days, members who are active were never harsh and rude towards the members as like nowadays. Not willing to mention the names here. I have expressed about this here few months back. Nowadays members can post without thinking whether is it rude or not. They just easily call people names and throw rough words on their own fellow brothers. Sarcasm is the popular attitude among the members here nowadays. Shame on them!
About the criticism, yes, members nowdays r afraid to face any negatives review towards ARR songs nowadays. If u say 1 negative word about the songs, u will have to prepare to face all kinda 'colorful' criticism from the people here. This behavior truly irks me. And i too truly believe the lack usage of carnatic raagam is the sole fact of his lack of soulfulness albums nowadays. I do hope this will reach A.R.Rahman. Unless A.R.Rahman is happy on how the way it is nowdays, that he is getting the recognition with the current pattern he is using, then we can just drop this matter. --- In [email protected], "sriramvr_in" <sriramvr...@...> wrote: > > Each member has a right to his opinion. I have been silently listening to the > comments made about me reg. criticism of album Blue "lacking soul". I Stand > by the fact anytime, anyday. Unfortunately there isn't anything which I can > take as constructive from those criticisms! Wish them luck and prosperity > throughout their life. > > Gopal, This group used to be a great forum previously but the fact that many > new people are fearing to accept any criticism these days! ARR fans have the > right to criticise ARR. Right to constructive criticism will be only a > healthy leading indicator and which will be wholeheartedly welcomed by the > Master himself. But unfortunately there aren't too many members who like > constructive criticisms these years. > > Had one valid point from a member saying that probably lesser usage of > carnatic raagas might be the reason. Reasonings like those will be an > eye-opener and will help in identifying the reason. > > What justification to be given when it simply lacks "soul"? > > > V R Sriram >
