I agree. Taste is a big factor. Many reviews have been bad, but some have been good. Many people don't like the movie, but some do like it. It's up to you to decide. I haven't seen the movie, but I think Mani was brave to make a film like this, good or bad.
--- In [email protected], "ravi" <ravis...@...> wrote: > > Personally I felt > The movie isnt a disaster at all as written by reviewers unless you watch > with the perception or the category one has to belong to that of the > reviewers who dont like. > I read in a post claiming Mani as a foolish, No he isnt. Its easy to say > somebody a fool, but what is difficult is to do even the little what one has > achieved. Only a fool can judge the other as a fool. And it takes an equal > capability to agree the genius in somebody. > Mani has a same problem with almost all his movies in which he takes long > time to describe the entire plot unlike Shankar who is perfect fit for masala > techniques. > Here Mani's perception as I would think was to look closely at the person who > appear good and bad in the eyes of a general society. Observing closely can > change the views. There is a good in bad person and there is a bad in the > good. With this itself Mani complicates and the slow pace in the start has > put him in bad situation as like what has happened now. > I liked the movie for the spectacular visuals which the normal eyes could > have missed. Somewhere deep in my heart I believe in the perception of mani > could have had of goodness in bad man & the vice versa. > We have seen ppl who have contemplated even Raamayan just because of their > perception and raavn the movie can have no discount either. > A reviewer himself is a human and it depends on his taste, views. Go watch > the movie if you have time and money to spare. There movies such as Dhoom, > Mohabbatein, which were liked by ppl and have bcome hits if that can be like > raavan is far better than those according to me just because of my personal > likings. >
