He is solid contributor, and I too have learned from them.
I appreciate his technical insights and I give him kudos in that
area.
No "we all" don't know he was joking. His reply to the list
was "Option A", so it wasn't a joke.
Tim
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Palmer
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 1:35 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Release of ARS 7.0 Info
Wow, pretty hard on James. We all knew he was joking!
Besides, he's a good, solid contributor and I've learned from his
posts!
Susan
On 4/23/06, Timothy
Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
No Rick, that's not what I meant. If BMC is talking about something, then so
can we.
What I meant was....the article isn't actually about the ARS product. That's
why it's a "feeble attempt at Friday humor"....
What I meant was:
A) If James didn't read the web article that the URL took him to, then he
should have. If he did, he would have realized that it's actually not about
Remedy (sorry to ruin it Steve), and thus the entire blurb about the NDA is
not needed. Stephen doesn't need to be chastised about how "bad" he is about
releasing info when in actuality, he wasn't releasing anything at all.
B) If James did read the web article that the URL sent him to, then the
blurb about the NDA is even more uncalled for since it was completely
irrelevant. It would then be just another instance of James trying to
either:
1) Demonstrate how much he knows and make sure that we all realize
it.
OR
2) Moderate/control the rest of us, because you know...we can't
really can't make those decisions for ourselves.
Which one was it? A, B1 or B2?
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 2:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Release of ARS 7.0 Info
Indeed - you mean you can't talk about something even if BMC is? I don't
think so, Tim.
Rick
________________________________
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) on behalf of Timothy
Powell
Sent: Sun 4/23/2006 6:21 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Release of ARS 7.0 Info
**
James,
Maybe you should look at the web article first......
Tim
________________________________
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of McKenzie, James J C-E LCMC
HQISEC/L3
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 6:31 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: OT: Release of ARS 7.0 Info
**
Dan:
Wow! What a punishment....
Actually, the release of ANY information on ARS 7.0, except by BMC, is a
violation of the NDA that testers are required to sign.
James
-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
To: [email protected]
Sent: 4/21/2006 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: ARS 7.0 Info
**
Quite.
Due to the lameness, and not including the OT: prefix in the subject
line,
you can't post any more attempts for 6 months, and you must read every
one that Gidd posts.
-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Heider, Stephen
Sent: April 21, 2006 16:00
To: [email protected]
Subject: ARS 7.0 Info
**
I finally found some info on ARS 7.0, code name Iron Horse.
http://www.dirtragmag.com/print/article.php?ID=408
<http://www.dirtragmag.com/print/article.php?ID=408&category=stuff_revie
ws> &category=stuff_reviews
Stephen
*feeble attempt at Friday humor ;)
__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___
__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___
__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___
__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___
____________________________________________________________________________
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org
_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org
__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___
