I'll probably get flogged for this both on the list and off, but... Whether or not someone is a 'solid' contributor or not is irrelevant. Whether or not it is a joke or not is irrelevant. Everyone here on the list is - allegedly - the same. On a basic level, we are each a person, and deserve to be treated with an equal measure of respect - professional and otherwise.
I do not support your post. It was pretty hard on the guy and appears to be more or less a statement of your opinion - nothing more. Messages like that shouldn't have a place here. If you disagree with someone strongly, you are free to send it offline. > He is solid contributor, and I too have learned from them. I appreciate > his > technical insights and I give him kudos in that area. > No "we all" don't know he was joking. His reply to the list was "Option > A", > so it wasn't a joke. > > Tim > > _____ > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Palmer > Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 1:35 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Release of ARS 7.0 Info > > > ** > Wow, pretty hard on James. We all knew he was joking! > > Besides, he's a good, solid contributor and I've learned from his posts! > > Susan > > > On 4/23/06, Timothy Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No Rick, that's not what I meant. If BMC is talking about something, then > so > can we. > > What I meant was....the article isn't actually about the ARS product. > That's > > why it's a "feeble attempt at Friday humor".... > > What I meant was: > > A) If James didn't read the web article that the URL took him to, then he > should have. If he did, he would have realized that it's actually not > about > Remedy (sorry to ruin it Steve), and thus the entire blurb about the NDA > is > not needed. Stephen doesn't need to be chastised about how "bad" he is > about > releasing info when in actuality, he wasn't releasing anything at all. > > B) If James did read the web article that the URL sent him to, then the > blurb about the NDA is even more uncalled for since it was completely > irrelevant. It would then be just another instance of James trying to > either: > 1) Demonstrate how much he knows and make sure that we all realize > it. > OR > 2) Moderate/control the rest of us, because you know...we can't > really can't make those decisions for ourselves. > > Which one was it? A, B1 or B2? > > Tim > > -----Original Message----- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook > Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 2:33 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Release of ARS 7.0 Info > > Indeed - you mean you can't talk about something even if BMC is? I don't > think so, Tim. > > Rick > > > ________________________________ > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) on behalf of Timothy > Powell > Sent: Sun 4/23/2006 6:21 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Release of ARS 7.0 Info > > > > > ** > James, > > Maybe you should look at the web article first...... > > Tim > > ________________________________ > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McKenzie, James J C-E LCMC > HQISEC/L3 > Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 6:31 PM > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: OT: Release of ARS 7.0 Info > > > ** > > Dan: > > Wow! What a punishment.... > > Actually, the release of ANY information on ARS 7.0, except by BMC, is a > violation of the NDA that testers are required to sign. > > James > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > To: [email protected] > Sent: 4/21/2006 2:12 PM > Subject: Re: ARS 7.0 Info > > ** > Quite. > Due to the lameness, and not including the OT: prefix in the subject > line, > you can't post any more attempts for 6 months, and you must read every > one that Gidd posts. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Heider, Stephen > Sent: April 21, 2006 16:00 > To: [email protected] > Subject: ARS 7.0 Info > > > ** > I finally found some info on ARS 7.0, code name Iron Horse. > > http://www.dirtragmag.com/print/article.php?ID=408 > <http://www.dirtragmag.com/print/article.php?ID=408> > <http://www.dirtragmag.com/print/article.php?ID=408 > <http://www.dirtragmag.com/print/article.php?ID=408&category=stuff_revie> > &category=stuff_revie > ws> &category=stuff_reviews > > Stephen > > *feeble attempt at Friday humor ;) > __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in > it___ > > __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in > it___ > > __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in > it___ > __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in > it___ > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > > ___ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > ___ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org > > > > __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in > it___ > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org > _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org
