In the release notes there is only one thing that points to Import and actually it is listed under "Server" SW00235418 fix memory leak in ARImport
I think you have logged SW00244816 - is this correct? This is still marked as "Work In Progress". We'll wait, I guess. Regards, Michiel On 7/23/06, Lucero, Michelle - IST contractor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Michiel: I was sent a pre-patch 17 admin Tool/import tool, that was suppose to address this issue. However, something was wrong with the file they provided. The fix was suppose to be in 6.3, patch 17. However, I haven't had a chance to install nor test. You might want to check the release notes for patch 17. Sorry, I couldn't be of more assistance. Thanks, Michelle -----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michiel Beijen Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 9:59 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Fallback Mapping - Does it work in 6.3 Michelle, Did you got this issue fixed? I just happened to stumble into it today as well, and we tried to use fallback on a non-core field. Regards, Michiel On 5/8/06, Lucero, Michelle - IST contractor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you. That's the definitive answer I was looking for. > > However, my tech support person believes that it should. And has now > been submitted as a bug. I couldn't find anywhere in the documentation > that states that core fields can or can't use fallback mapping. > > I will follow-up with tech support. > > Michelle > > -----Original Message----- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steinigans-Hillemann, Joerg > Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 1:36 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Fallback Mapping - Does it work in 6.3 > > Michelle, > > I've had the same problem and my support told me that the fallback does > not work on the system fields 'modified by', 'modify date' and 'create > date'. > > Joerg > > -----Original Message----- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lucero, Michelle - IST > contractor > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 5:13 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Fallback Mapping - Does it work in 6.3 > > > Yes, there are multiple workarounds. I simply want to know if the > fallback mapping really works. More, specifically if it works on core > fields. > > Michelle > > -----Original Message----- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heider, Stephen > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 10:11 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Fallback Mapping - Does it work in 6.3 > > Is it possible to update the .CSV file by adding the current timestamp > for missing values? Then, try to import? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lucero, Michelle - IST > contractor > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 11:08 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Fallback Mapping - Does it work in 6.3 > > Hi, Friends: > > I am attempting to import a .CSV file into a brand new (empty) form. > One of the columns has data in about 85% of the rows. In the cases > where the data in that column is empty, I want to use fallback mapping. > > I have defined a fallback for the Create Date field and have set it with > $ TIMESTAMP$ I have updated the preference setting under > File/Preference/Error Handling to "Try Fallback Mapping before alerting > user". > I have marked required fields as optional during import (possibly > irrelevant in this case as it produces the same behavior whether checked > or not) > > The error that occurs is one that I would expect to receive should I not > have a fallback mapping defined: > "Record 3 : Required field cannot be reset to a NULL value -- Create > Date (ARERR 326)" > > Although, there are work-arounds to this, I simply want to know if > anyone has successfully used fallback mapping with a .CSV file in 6.3? > One of the obvious work-arounds I used was to create another date/time > field. But, my curiosity got the better of me and I made it required. > I was able to use the fallback mapping with this date/time field. I > mapped it to the same column that I used for Create Date. So far it > works for non-core, Required fields. > > Specifically, has anyone successfully defined fallback mapping for a > core date/time field? > > ARS Server 6.3, patch 11 > Remedy Admin/Import Tool 6.3, patch 12 > Windows 2003, SQL Server 2000 > Remedy User Tool 6.3, patch > > Thanks in advance, > Michelle > > ESM Mission: "To provide the most accurate, timely, and actionable > information to our customers so that they can effectively support the > Mary Kay IST environment". > > ________________________________________________________________________ > _______ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org > > ________________________________________________________________________ > _______ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org > > ________________________________________________________________________ > _______ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org > > ________________________________________________________________________ > _______ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org > > ________________________________________________________________________ _______ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org > ________________________________________________________________________ _______ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org
_______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org
