Re: DSO replacement (UNCLASSIFIED)

[Rick Cook]

**

Totally agree - DB replication is much faster, more scalable, and more easily managed (if you have a competent DBA) than DSO.

 

Rick
 

On 11/7/06, Hall Chad - chahal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

**

I would suggest a standby database server instead of DSO if all you need is failover. SQL Server Log Shipping or Oracle Data Guard are both good options for this. Use another server (or it could be the same one) and install AR Server for app failover. This gives you failover at the app and db layers without the AR Server overhead (and synchronization problems) associated with DSO.

 

However, if your goal is to have a reporting server then you may want to stick with DSO.

 

Chad Hall 
(501) 342-2650

---

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Frank, Gordon M Mr NISO/Lockheed Martin
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 10:36 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: DSO replacement (UNCLASSIFIED)

 

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

Caveats: NONE

Hello all,

We are currently utilizing DSO to mirror two production servers. We use Like IDs to do this. We are getting performance hits because of this. I'd like to replace this with something else. I can think of several options, but I'm looking for other's ideas.

 

Is there a preferred method for producing mirror images of two productions servers?

 

The goal is to always have a fall back server in case the primary goes down.

 

Thanks up front,

Gordon Frank

Lockheed Martin

 

 

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

Caveats: NONE

__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___