Actually...

At least on a v6.3 ARS server Patch 2 (on Solaris) a Filter can alter
the value of field 2 during "Submit".

I am not sure if this is a "nice" bug in this ARS server or not. But
it does make some sense to me to allow it during "Submit". So I hope
it is not a bug.

--
Carey Matthew Black
Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP)
ARS = Action Request System(Remedy)

Love, then teach
Solution = People + Process + Tools
Fast, Accurate, Cheap.... Pick two.


On 11/30/06, patrick zandi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
**
so our design should be where the customer data is AL:setfields the
submitter field with their specialized login id (which can get complicated)
for inside and outside customers. Prior to submission.
thanks..


On 11/30/06, Misi Mladoniczky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes (and no...),
>
> If I recall correctly, you can set it manually or with Active-Links. You
> can, unfortunately, not set it using filters... It is considered a change,
> even if the filter triggers on submit.
>
>        Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se
>
> > So that actually answers a question I hadn't had time to test:  With
> > "Submitter-Mode-Locked" set, you can still set the value of the
submitter
> > field on submit to whatever you want.  Is that correct?
> >
> > I'm clear on not being able to modify it afterward, but since I usually
> > use $USER$ as the default for submitter, the need to use a different
> > submitter had never come up.
> >
> > Thad
> > P.S.  It must be an alliteration kind of day. ("submitter" and "user"
seem
> > rampant in that email.)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Misi Mladoniczky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent by: "Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)"
> > <[email protected] >
> > 11/30/2006 07:13 AM
> > Please respond to
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
> > To
> > [email protected]
> > cc
> >
> > Subject
> > Re: Question on license
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The "submitter" is not neccessarily the person submitting the ticket.
> >
> > At submit-time you can specify any login name in the submitter-field.
> >
> > So if you know the read-license-person who will want to update a ticket
at
> > submit-time, you can enter his/hers login-name in the submitter-field.
> >
> > I usually try to put the "customer-login" in the submitter-field
> > regardless if a person submits from the Web or if he calls the
> > Service-Desk by phone.
> >
> > The limitations with submitter-mode-locked is just that you can not
change
> > it after you have submitted the ticket.
> >
> >         Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se
> >
> >> Yes that will work but some of the tickets are generated from the
> > helpdesk
> >> people.  So the helpdesk person is the submitter and the logon* is just
> > a
> >> requestor with read only.
> >>
> >>
> >> John Atherly
> >> American Power Conversion
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> 401-789-5735 Ext. 2120
> >> 1-800-788-2208 Ext. 2120
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>              patrick zandi
> >>              <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>              COM> To
> >>              Sent by: "Action          [email protected]
> >>              Request System cc
> >>              discussion
> >>              list(ARSList)" Subject
> >>              <[EMAIL PROTECTED]         Re: Question on license
> >>              ORG>
> >>
> >>
> >>              11/30/2006 09:59
> >>              AM
> >>
> >>
> >>              Please respond to
> >>              [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>                     RG
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ** Whoops.. did not even see michelle's answer.. Scarry..
> >>
> >> On 11/30/06, patrick zandi < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>   Just looking this over.. Submitter locked mode allows the submitter
to
> >>   update his ticket in Read license mode.
> >>   The approver already has a Fixed or Floating license.
> >>   So you could use a Diary field to log the conversation by inputs via
> >>   Email submission or API or Mid-tier.
> >>   Create a Question 400 character field, or 2000 for that matter. and
> >>   Create an Answer Field.
> >>   If the Question is placed in the field - push to diary, and send
email
> >> to
> >>   customer with a URL or Email form.
> >>   Answer comes into the Answer field and gets pushed to the Diary.
> >>
> >>   Does this fit the License scenario ?
> >>   They both have access to the Diary and Question and Answer field.
> >>   The submitter is able to update his information.
> >>   The approver is able to update the ticket.
> >>
> >>   Just a thought.
> >>
> >>
> >>   On 11/30/06, John Atherly <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> >>    Yes we want to remain legal on this.   What I have been task to
> > create
> >>    is
> >>    away for an approver to ask a question to the requestor.
> >>
> >>    What is happening a change request will come in for access to one of
> >> the
> >>    network drives.  In the justification field the end uses will type
in
> >>    answer such as "New Job"    These answer do not help the approves in
> >>    deciding on granting access or denying access.   Currently the
> > approves
> >>    either deny the request or has to create an email to ask for more
> >> reason
> >>    why they need access.  Then a couple days later when they get a
> >> response
> >>
> >>    they have to find the request to either approve or deny.   I was
> >> looking
> >>    for a way to be able to start a two way communication between the
> >>    approver
> >>    and the requestor.   So I would need a field that approvers can ask
a
> >>    question in and a field were the requestor can answer too and keep a
> >>    record
> >>    of the transactions (worklog)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>    John Atherly
> >>    American Power Conversion
> >>    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>    401-789-5735 Ext. 2120
> >>    1-800-788-2208 Ext. 2120
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>                "Lucero, Michelle
> >>                - IST contractor"
> >>                <Michelle.Lucero@
> >>    To
> >>                 MKCORP.COM>               [email protected]
> >>                Sent by: "Action
> >>    cc
> >>                Request System
> >>                discussion
> >>    Subject
> >>                list(ARSList)"            Re: Question
on license
> >>                <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>                ORG>
> >>
> >>
> >>                11/29/2006 03:07
> >>                PM
> >>
> >>
> >>                Please respond to
> >>                 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>                       RG
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>    Hi, John:
> >>
> >>    To modify an entry, one does need the ability to WRITE.  If the
> > system
> >>    is placed in Submitter Mode Locked, individuals assigned Read
> > Licenses
> >>    can Search, Submit, Display and Modify entries that they have
> >> submitted;
> >>
> >>    as long as their login id is placed in field ID 2.  And, Submitter
> > has
> >>    WRITE access to each of the fields that needs to be updated.
> >>
> >>    There are multiple ways to address.  One can save thousands in
> >>    maintenance costs, while remaining legal.  It all depends on your
> >>    company or client's needs.  Obviously there may be some individuals
> >> that
> >>    will still require a WRITE license.
> >>    =================================
> >>    From Remedy Admin 6.3 Help - License Types
> >>    Read
> >>    Enables users to search and display existing requests.
Administrators
> >>    can configure the AR System server to enable users to submit new
> >>    requests and modify or save data in existing requests. (See "Special
> >>    submitter mode".)
> >>
> >>    Restricted Read
> >>    Allows users to search the AR System forms and submit new requests
> > but
> >>    does not allow users to modify existing requests under any
> > conditions.
> >>    It does, however, allow the same login account to access the AR
> > System
> >>    from multiple IP addresses simultaneously, such as when browsing a
> >>    knowledge base or completing on-line surveys.
> >>
> >>    Fixed Write
> >>    Includes all the capabilities of a Read license, and also enables
> > users
> >>    to modify and save data for existing requests based on the groups to
> >>    which the user belongs. AR System administrators and
> > subadministrators
> >>    must have a Fixed Write license. Other AR System users who
> > consistently
> >>    need to modify requests must also have Fixed Write licenses.
> >>    A user cannot be assigned the same Fixed Write license more than
> > three
> >>    times in one week. If this limitation is exceeded, the user must
wait
> >>    one week from the first assignment of the Fixed Write license before
> > it
> >>    can be assigned again.
> >>
> >>    Floating Write
> >>    Includes all the capabilities of a Read license, and also enables
> > users
> >>    to modify and save data for existing requests based on the groups to
> >>    which the user belongs. Floating Write licenses can be used by
> > multiple
> >>    users, one user at a time. This type of license is designed for
users
> >>    who occasionally need to modify and save data for existing requests.
> >>
> >>    -----Original Message-----
> >>    From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> >>    [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Atherly
> >>    Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 1:47 PM
> >>    To: [email protected]
> >>    Subject: Question on license
> >>
> >>    If I create a total new application from scratch then the public
will
> >>    not
> >>    need a write license to modify a record!  What I'm looking at doing
> > is
> >> a
> >>
> >>
> >>    record will be created by support and then will be updated by the
> >>    enduser.      I thought that this was true but my partners in crime
> >>    different from me.
> >>
> >>    Thanks
> >>    (No it's not a bet so I will not win or lose a beer)
> >>
> >>
________________________________________________________________________
> >>    _______
> >>    UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> >> ARSlist:"Where
> >>    the Answers Are"
> >>
> >>
> >
_______________________________________________________________________________
> >>
> >>
> >>    UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> >> ARSlist:"Where
> >>    the Answers Are"
> >>
> >>
> >
_______________________________________________________________________________
> >>
> >>    UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> >> ARSlist:"Where
> >>    the Answers Are"
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>   --
> >>   Patrick Zandi
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Patrick Zandi __20060125_______________________This
posting was
> > submitted
> >> with HTML in it___
> >>
> >>
> >
_______________________________________________________________________________
> >> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
ARSlist:"Where
> >> the Answers Are"
> >>
> >
> >
_______________________________________________________________________________
> > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where
> > the Answers Are"
> >
> >
> >
> > ***IMPORTANT NOTICE: This communication, including any attachment,
> > contains information that may be confidential or privileged, and is
> > intended solely for the entity or individual to whom it is addressed.
If
> > you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and
are
> > hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
> > message is strictly prohibited.  Nothing in this email, including any
> > attachment, is intended to be a legally binding signature.***
> >
> >
_______________________________________________________________________________
> > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where
> > the Answers Are"
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where
the Answers Are"
>



--

Patrick Zandi __20060125_______________________This posting
was submitted with HTML in it___

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers 
Are"

Reply via email to