Connection Settings are only relevant for midtier -> ar-server connections. And indeed, there is no need to have any persistence on this type of connection. If this connection is also routed through a loadbalancer in front of your ar-servers, you can disable persistence there. But this will definitely not solve your problem.
KR Conny Von: ARSList <arslist-boun...@arslist.org> Im Auftrag von JD Hood Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. März 2019 17:19 An: ARSList <arslist@arslist.org> Betreff: Re: Load Balancing and Session Timeouts If you are referencing the "Connection Settings" in the mid tier config, yes we have tried that (and it remains configured), but it did not help and the issue persists. The "Connection Lifespan" is set to 60 minutes and the "Connection Timeout" is 0 (which is infinite, correct?). Tomcat and Netscaler both are configured for 65 minute sessions. Question to all -- if the "Connection Settings" in the mid tier are configured, should we remove any session persistence settings form the Netscaler? Thanks, -JDHood On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 10:54 AM LJ LongWing <lj.longw...@gmail.com<mailto:lj.longw...@gmail.com>> wrote: JD, If you are on 9.x, you can configure Session Sharing (clustering) in your Mid-Tier containers, and then you wouldn't need sticky bits (persistence) On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 8:49 AM JD Hood <hood...@gmail.com<mailto:hood...@gmail.com>> wrote: All, We have a simple load balancing arrangement between a Netscaler and two SSL Mid tiers (v18.08). End users are sporadically encountering session timeout errors when they would not be expected. Sometimes within a few minutes of connecting and in the midst of creating a new incident, they will get a session timeout error (arerr 9201) and they will have to refresh the page and re-authenticate. I've found the following BMC Support KB and shared it with the team: https://bmcsites.force.com/casemgmt/sc_KnowledgeArticle?sfdcid=kA214000000d7ZtCAI Our netscaler resource advises that the cookie-based persistence option is not available when he is configuring load-balancing. I believe he is configuring persistence as IP based. Other than that, we can't identify any non-recommended configuration issues. I suspect that the cookie-based load balancer configuration is significant, but not being a LB expert, it's outside of my skillset and my most convincing argument at the moment is, "...because BMC Support recommends it..." Does anyone have any experience with a basic, simple Netscaler configuration to balance two SSL Mid tiers based on least number of connections (or any other strategy)? Or perhaps session timeouts are a known issue for other reasons that I have yet to stumble across? Thanks, -JDHood -- ARSList mailing list ARSList@arslist.org<mailto:ARSList@arslist.org> https://mailman.rrr.se/cgi/listinfo/arslist -- ARSList mailing list ARSList@arslist.org<mailto:ARSList@arslist.org> https://mailman.rrr.se/cgi/listinfo/arslist
-- ARSList mailing list ARSList@arslist.org https://mailman.rrr.se/cgi/listinfo/arslist
