> Support told me they are recommending JBOSS instead of Tomcat ?
 
If such a statement was made by a support representative, it probably
represents a personal opinion and not an official position of BMC.  BMC
does not "recommend" one servlet engine over another.  The choice of
servlet engine, where a choice is available, is left to the customer.
SLM is an example where there currently is not a choice, but for AR
System in general, customers may choose to use any of the supported
servlet engines.
 
Note that even though ServletExec is not distributed by BMC anymore,
customers may still continue to use ServletExec as it is completely
supported.  In no way did the replacement of ServletExec with Tomcat
within the distribution represent any recommendation of removing
ServletExec and replacing it with Tomcat in existing or future planned
environments.  The FAQ in the statement of direction explains this as
well.  If ServletExec works better in your environment, you can continue
using it and still maintain support from BMC for that configuration.
 
Thanks,
 
-David J. Easter
Sr. Product Manager, Service Management Business Unit
 
BMC Software, Inc.
 
________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of strauss
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 11:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Mid Tier Installation 7.0.1 Patch 001 JDK error....


** 
They had better not be changing horses again - we have already had to
start getting up to speed on a new japp server and web server that we
have no prior experience with (Tomcat and the Tomcat web), since
switching to Tomcat on IIS actually runs _worse_ than ServletExec
(response times are actually slower). Jboss is even less well known -
not used at all here, and we have refused to install the SLM collector
until it runs on either Tomcat or ServletExec, as was promised at
UserWorld (and still undelivered). BMC would be ill advised to try to
switch us to yet another japp server in the middle of the whole 7.x
conversion process; it would indicate very poor decision-making
processes on their part. That (poor decision-making) is already evident
enough in their decisions to start selling their applications without
the three fixed user licenses they have always provided to
configure/administer the app. Would you buy a new car that came with no
wheels and tires?

Christopher Strauss, Ph.D.
Remedy Database Administrator
University of North Texas Computing Center
http://remedy.unt.edu/helpdesk/ 


________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of patrick zandi
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 12:30 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Mid Tier Installation 7.0.1 Patch 001 JDK error....


** 
Support told me they are recommending JBOSS instead of Tomcat ? it is
faster and better to work with...
Ask them about that as well..

 
On 2/7/07, Kemes, Lisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

        ** 
        Update...
         
        I uninstalled Java 5 and installed Java 1.4.2 and started up the
Mid Tier installation again and I'm no longer getting this error
message, but I still can't get to the mid tier configuration site.  
         
        I did a new install of IIS 6, Java, Mid Tier and Tomcat on our
Windows 2003 server.  Weird, you would think it would work.  I'm sending
a ticket to Remedy Support. 
         
        thanks!
         
        Lisa

         
________________________________

        From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[email protected] ] On Behalf Of Kemes, Lisa
        Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 12:04 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Re: Mid Tier Installation 7.0.1 Patch 001 JDK error....
        
         
        ** 
        
        Has anyone received this error even though they have the correct
JDK installed?  Did you have to do anything different?  
         
        Lisa
        __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with
HTML in it___ 
        __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with
HTML in it___ 




-- 
Patrick Zandi __20060125_______________________This posting was
submitted with HTML in it___ __20060125_______________________This
posting was submitted with HTML in it___ 

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"

Reply via email to