Hi Peter

 

I am sure that applying the DST patches to your server does not alter any
historical data stored in your database.  The issue is with how the epoch
time in secs is converted and displayed by the client.  So, was the client
you were running this test through patched for DST changes??

 

Regards

 

David Sanders

Remedy Solution Architect

Enterprise Service Suite @ Work

==========================

ARS List Award Winner 2005

Best 3rd party Remedy Application

 

tel +44 1494 468980

mobile +44 7710 377761

email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

web http://www.westoverconsulting.co.uk
<http://www.westoverconsulting.co.uk/> 

 

  _____  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lammey, Peter A.
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 9:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: 6.3 Patch 20 - Issues with years prior to 2007

 

I checked our ARS 6.3 development system which has been patched to 20 and
looked up some tickets that were a copies of what we have on our production
environment (which has not been patched yet).

The Create dates on the tickets on our development and production were the
same.

I also verified that the OS of our development server was patched.

 

Our platforms are the following:

 

AR Server - Windows 2003

Mid Tier - Linux Java 1.5.04

 

 

Thanks 
Peter Lammey 
ESPN MIT Technical Services & Applications Management 
860-766-4761 

 

 

  _____  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Cleereman (IT)
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 4:07 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: 6.3 Patch 20 - Issues with years prior to 2007

** 

Peter, 

 

Tickets from March 12th - April 2nd 2006 and from October 29th - November
5th of 2006 all seem to be off by an hour.  All other tickets outside of
those ranges seem to be accurate.

 

Frederick,

 

Each of the patches you asked about was applied prior to the Remedy patches
being applied.

 

Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Grooms, Frederick W
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 3:38 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: 6.3 Patch 20 - Issues with years prior to 2007

** 

Just to check ...

 

On the AIX box you have

 - The AIX DST patches applied

 - The updated Java

 - The ARS server patch

 

On the Windows box you have

 - The Microsoft DST patches applied

 - The updated Java

 - The ARS Mid-Tier patch

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lammey, Peter A.
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 3:26 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: 6.3 Patch 20 - Issues with years prior to 2007

** 

Does this mean that for your saved tickets that were created between March
11th 2006 and April 2nd 2006 that the Create Time for the tickets are now
off by one hour after you installed Patch 20?

Thanks 
Peter Lammey 
ESPN MIT Technical Services & Applications Management 
860-766-4761 

 

 


  _____  


From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Cleereman (IT)
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 3:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: 6.3 Patch 20 - Issues with years prior to 2007

** 

Hi All, 

I'm running version 6.3 of ARServer under Oracle 9 on AIX, and version 6.3
of Mid-Tier on Windows 2000 in my development environment.  I've just
installed Patch 20 for both, and am in the process of doing some preliminary
testing.

Remedy seems to be applying the revised schedule for 2007 for earlier years
as well.  For example, it seems to be seeing March 20th 2007 as Eastern
Daylight Time (EDT), which is correct.  But it seems to see March 20th 2006
as EDT as well.  In 2006 EDT did not go into effect until April 2nd, so it
should see that date as Eastern Standard Time (EDT).

This is an issue for us, as we do a lot of historical reporting. 

Has anyone else running 6.3 Patch 20 (or 7.1 Patch 1) noticed any problems
with Daylight Saving time calculations for 2006 or prior years?

Eric Cleereman 

__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ 

__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"

Reply via email to