Are you not able to apply the same methodology? If you define user test1 and TEST1 do you not get the same functionality as test1 and test2?
-----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Ashton Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 7:24 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: associate a user name with a preference server Thanks, L.J. That works exactly as you described. Unfortunately, the example I gave did not adequately define the nature of my problem. My two users who require different preference servers are actually called test1 and TEST1 (utilizing case sensitivity of user names, which apparently does not extend to preference server association). Neither of these naming conventions is readily changeable; test1 duplicates NT logins for integrated security, and TEST1 is an external system which we have no choice but to use, and over which we have utterly no control (so those cannot be changed either). ____________________________________________________________________________ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are" _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
