What you're seeing has been posted to the list earlier.

The Windows OS patches are not year specific and as a result a query using the 
desktop client will cause the effects you are seeing.

Dave
--------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wireless)

----- Original Message -----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Sat Mar 03 04:27:57 2007
Subject: Re: DST Simulated Test - Failed

** 
In relation to simulating the test, has anyone tested the patch for previous 
DST's? I have implemented Patch 21 and successfully tested for the DST offset 
moving forward, but I also decided to test for DST offset time based on 
previous DST's that have occurred in the past and the DST appears to be off a 
week. It's as though the Patches that have been created are for DST in their 
entirety. Now I can't think of anything off the top of my head that might be 
affected, but I am guessing that this is going to have an impact on some 
environments. Can anyone shed some light on whether they tested these patches 
against previous DST's and potential impact that the now incorrect past dates 
might impose? I'm thinking Patch 22 is just around the corner.
 
G Rogers

        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Easter, David <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
        Newsgroups: public.remedy.arsystem.general
        To: [email protected] 
        Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 11:57 AM
        Subject: Re: DST Simulated Test - Failed

        ** 
        Correct.  Time zone conversions are done at the client for data being 
displayed or submitted by the client.
         
                -David J. Easter
        Sr. Product Manager, Service Management Business Unit
        BMC Software, Inc.
         
        The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed 
in this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc.  My 
voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a role as a 
spokesperson, liaison or public relations representative for BMC Software, Inc.

________________________________

        From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL 
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Bean
        Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 11:41 AM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Re: DST Simulated Test - Failed
        
        
        ** 
        Yes, I believe it would matter -- timestamps are displayed according to 
the client's offset from GMT, regardless whether the value was set by server.
         
        --Thomas
         

                ----- Original Message ----- 
                From: Aaron Keller <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
                Newsgroups: gmane.comp.crm.arsystem.general
                To: [email protected] 
                Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 13:20
                Subject: Re: DST Simulated Test - Failed

                ** 

                Would that matter?  Isn’t create_date supposed to be set by the 
server?

                 

                -Aaron

                * Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

                ________________________________

                                From: Action Request System discussion 
list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Easter, David
                Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 2:04 PM
                To: [email protected]
                Subject: Re: DST Simulated Test - Failed

                 

                Did you patch the OS on the client doing the submission?  

                 

                Thanks,

                 

                -David J. Easter

                Sr. Product Manager, Service Management Business Unit

                BMC Software, Inc.

                 

                The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action 
expressed in this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc. 
 My voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a role as a 
spokesperson, liaison or public relations representative for BMC Software, Inc.

                 

                ________________________________

                                From: Action Request System discussion 
list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lammey, Peter A.
                Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 10:24 AM
                To: [email protected]
                Subject: DST Simulated Test - Failed

                ** 

                We finished patching our Remedy ARS 6.3 dev server up to Patch 
20 and also our server team patched our Application dev server's OS for DST.

                We adjusted the time on our dev server to March 12 and left the 
time the same and I moved my machine's date up to March 12 (left the time the 
same).

                I created a test ticket and the ticket's create date was wrong: 

                Time on the server was 3/12/2007 1:11:18 PM 
                Create time saved on the ticket was set to 3/12/2007 2:11:18 
PM. 

                It seems to us that the patch did not work. 

                Has anyone else been able to simulate this kind of test to 
verify Patch 20 and verify if it corrects the DST issue? 

                 

                Thanks 
                Peter Lammey 
                ESPN MIT Technical Services & Applications Management 
                860-766-4761 

                __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted 
with HTML in it___ 

                SunCom is the wireless company that's committed to doing things 
differently. 
                
                Things we want you to know.
                
                This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential 
and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they 
are addressed. This communication may contain material protected by the 
attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient or the person 
responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised 
that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, 
forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
                
                __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted 
with HTML in it___ __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted 
with HTML in it___

        __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML 
in it___ __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML 
in it___ 

__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ 

Reply via email to