For the brave and/or foolish, anything is possible. :) Rick _____ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 9:26 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0)
** Rick, Thanks for your response.. Good to know it is possible :-) Joe ----- Original Message ---- From: Rick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 7:48:40 PM Subject: Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0) ** Joe, the version of ARS is irrelevant - CMDB 2.x needs to be manually mapped to ITSM 6. The white paper, if it ever comes out, will tell you how to map that, but without it, you're on your own. Rick _____ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 7:40 PM To: [email protected] Subject: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0) ** Disregard my previous email... my question actually is is 6.0 Change running on a 7.x ARS platform compatible with CMDB 2.0? I know this might not be supported if you go strictly according to the compatibility matrix but am wondering if this combination could be made workable either directly or using some sort of a workaround.. Any good reasons besides the compatibility matrix why it would not work? Joe _____ Sucker-punch <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49981/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailb eta/features_spam.html> spam with award-winning protection. Try the free <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49981/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailb eta/features_spam.html> Yahoo! Mail Beta. __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
