Laura,
I just downloaded 6.3 today from the same place. LJ Head suggested
installing Admin 6, RDP, Admin 7 in that order.
LJ also mentioned that RDP 6.3 might not be compatible with ARS 7.x
objects - what has your experience been?
Thanks Laura, LJ, and Warren for your feedback.
Michael Durrant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
________________________________
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura York
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 2:56 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Remedy Developer Plus
**
Hi Michael,
I have Remedy Developer Plus version 6.3 p1492 installed with Admin
version 7.0.0 p2 and it is working. However, I have run into a problem
with large forms that have lots of associated workflow, I keep getting a
JVM error that says I need to increase the heap size in the registry.
What version of RDP do you have? I found ver 6.3 in the patch download
area of the BMC support site.
HTH,
Laura York
generationE Technologies
________________________________
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Durrant, Michael M. - ITSD
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 3:03 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Remedy Developer Plus
Does anyone use this anymore? Does it work with 7.x? I tried
installing it and it told me I didn't have an appropriate version of
Administrator installed - I'm running 7.0.0 p2 - the latest and greatest
as I understand.
Your feedback is most appreciated. Thanks!
Michael Durrant
IT Systems Integration Analyst
Division of Information Technology
Idaho Department of Health and Welfare
The information contained in this email may be privileged, confidential
or otherwise protected from disclosure. All persons are advised that
they may face penalties under state and federal law for sharing this
information with unauthorized individuals. If you received this email
in error, please reply to the sender that you have received this
information in error. Also, please delete this email after replying to
the sender.
__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with
HTML in it___
The information contained in this email may be privileged, confidential or
otherwise protected from disclosure. All persons are advised that they may
face penalties under state and federal law for sharing this information with
unauthorized individuals. If you received this email in error, please reply to
the sender that you have received this information in error. Also, please
delete this email after replying to the sender.
_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the
Answers Are"
