Hi Joe, I haven't tried increasing the size of 112 but just wanted throw out the idea of possibly using multiple Dynamic Fields (DF) instead of increasing the size of 112. You could have your workflow that populates the DF check number of characters in the first DF and if number of characters for the next value you are going to add to it is going to make it larger than the field length, start adding it to the next DF and so on.
I haven't worked with ITSM 7 yet so I am not sure how much trouble it would be to add Dynamic Fields instead of using 112 which I am assuming is already on the form(s). Jason -----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe D'Souza Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 7:54 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Field size limit of Group List field in the User form... Has anyone had issues with it? For a test user I wanted to give all the possible permissions there are to give in on ITSM V7 apps and somewhere halfway down the process I got the error: ARERR [306] Value does not fall within the limits specified for the field : (Maximum length - 255) : User : Group List If you were faced with this, did you face any problems increasing the size of this field? Ordinarily I would do it and propagate the size change to other related fields on other forms, but since its a field in the restricted range and that too on the user form I'm a little apprehensive before doing it.. Cheers Joe No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.1/777 - Release Date: 4/26/2007 3:23 PM ____________________________________________________________________________ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are" _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
