I have heard the "Remote Mid-Tier Rumor" as well, and honestly have
tested it internally and it seems to not hold true, at least for our
environment(s).

 

We have 6.3 servers (DEV/TEST/PROD) in NA/EU/AP and when I point the NA
web server to AP/EU, it seems just as slow as using the native client.
(Win2003, IIS, Servlet Exec)

 

We have one 7.x server (DEV/TEST/PROD) in EU and a sandbox in NA, when I
point NA to EU, it seems just as slow as using the native client.
(Win2003, Tomcat, Jboss)

 

While there might be a slight performance increase, it is not "human
perceivable" from the UI stand point. Workflow is still workflow, which
must query forms, etc.

 

Our network team is currently trying to find web-accelerators
(compression, etc) to stick on both ends as a test...

 

>> HOWEVER <<

 

For all performance related issues I always suggest:

 

Establish a "Base Line" timing for certain key forms (we use Remedy
Support, HPD:HelpDesk and CHG:Change) for "Certain Operations" (query by
ID, submit, etc) and obtain the client LOG FILE (API only) for this
reference.

 

Setup simple "Monitoring" which runs periodically during the day (ours
is every half hour) to perform certain operations. (our little VB
Application just does a "query where '1' = "known_value") Obviously take
the response time, and stuff it in a history table for trending.

 

Now you are "set with baseline"... if you are not happy with the
baseline, then you can do Performance-101 (do not do table refreshes on
display, reduce # fields on the view, etc)

 

Then when something is reported you can ask "what changed to cause the
issue"

>> Comparison to baseline is x% worse? Something to really worry about
or just 'whiny users' :-)

>> Release?

>> # Users increased?

>> ticket volume increase?

>> link volume increase? Although you indicate it is dedicated, is other
traffic getting routed through somehow?

 

Unfortunately, performance is in the eyes of the end-user, and without a
baseline, you have no comparison. 

Thanks-n-advance; 

HDT Platform Incident / Problem Manager & Architect 
Robert Molenda 
IT OS PA 
Tel: +1 408 503 2701 
Fax: +1 408 503 2912 
Mobile: +1 408 472 8097 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Quality begins with your actions.

 

________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of L. J. Head
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 6:09 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Remedy performance Overseas

 

I don't know if this applies to you but I have been told via the list
that if you have a slow link between client and server and are using
Mid-Tier that you can place a mid-tier the other side of the link
(client side) and although the initial caching will be slow, overall
speed to the clients will increase.  It is true what another poster said
about chattiness between the client and server...but in this case the
'server' would be the mid-tier...which would be local...so the only
information that would need to transfer over the wire would be the Data

 

________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Kovalcik
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 5:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Remedy performance Overseas

** 
All, 

        We are having an issue with performance across the pond to our
India location.  Currently, we have one HPUX server here in the States
with a dedicated network line overseas.  Now, granted the line is not as
big as it should be and I know that Remedy is resource intensive, but is
there anything that we can do to help performance ??  Any info would be
greatly appreciated. 



                         Thanks,
                                   John M. Kovalcik
                                   Service Management Sr. Analyst
                                      ITIL Foundations Certified
                                   Global Information Technology
                                   Kennametal Inc.
                                   1600 Technology Way
 
                                   Phone:  724-539-5228
                                   Fax:       724-539-5797


__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___

__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"

Reply via email to