Alfred, Thank you for your help over the years.
Good luck in your future endeavors and may your retirement be peaceful. Dave -------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wireless) ----- Original Message ----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) <[email protected]> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Wed Jun 06 15:50:02 2007 Subject: 'defective by design' ** Thank you, Axton. Yes, dear listers, there is a big difference between “as designed” and “limitation of implementation.” I am getting ready to retire after 48 years, 8 months and more than 25 years of stuffing all that dough into the Social Security system. I would like to pass along to all of the listers one small piece of advice: before calling support, remove the chip from your shoulder. The Remedy support team members are real people and deserve your respect. Yes, there are those who are still novices, and if you will help them to become better support persons, they will become better support persons. You will reward yourself by cooperating and will gain nothing by ranting about poor support. I wish you all successful implementations of the Remedy product. I have seen a lot in my lifetime and this product is truly one of the best. Alfred Langen Remedy Technical Support Unix Server Team -----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Axton Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 11:17 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Administrator performance slow -RESOLVED As designed.... I hear this a lot on the list these days... maybe bmc needs a disposition of 'defective by design' for these things... there is a big difference between 'the design is defective', 'the product is defective (does not meet the design)', and 'the design is good, this is a limitation of the implementation' Axton Grams __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___
