Yes, it is true. Everybody but Migrator seems to have that concept well in hand...
Rick On 9/10/07, Joe D'Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ** Doesn't General Access have the same ID irrespective? I thought that > when these application groups are created they get created with the same ID > across any server.. Is that not true? > > Joe > > -----Original Message----- > *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of *Rick Cook > *Sent:* Monday, September 10, 2007 7:10 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Problem with Migrator > > ** Here's a heads-up for those of you <ahem> trusting <ahem> enough to use > Migrator to move your code about: > > I did a small migration this morning of just a few dozen forms (no data, > no workflow). Migrator 7.0.1 p4 - Server 7.0.1 p2 on source server, 7.0.1p4 > on destination server. > > All of the forms were migrated, but when I ran a difference report > immediately afterward, on three of the forms (1 Regular, 2 D.O.), some of > the group permissions were not migrated successfully on some (not all) of > the fields. Since the group is one of the core ITSM groups (General > Access), which does exist with the same ID on both the source and > destination servers, I think this is kind of a problem. > > We'll see if Support can help, but this is really an engineering issue. I > can't wait for BMC to give us a migration tool I can trust. > > -- > Rick Cook > > _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
