Fascinating thread.
 
Having been in Remedy for the past 9 years, off and on again, I am not really 
surprised at the advent of an ITIL standard. Pre Version "7" version of Remedy 
have been driving at the ITIL goals for quite a while.  I fact, I would say 
that the ITIL folks "stole" their ideas from Remedy, but ...
 
Having seen ITSM 7 roll out, in a very large corporation with SARBOX 
constraints and a mature change management process defined, I think it is a 
good tool.  That company could afford to spend the mega bucks for the tool and 
its care and feeding, because it supported their need to demonstrate SARBOX 
compliance.
 
I am currently fielding ITSM 7 for a smaller organization with out a rich 
change control process. They are adopting the tool because their sup-piers 
requires ITIL like processes.  They purchased ITSM 7 because they felt that it 
would give them those processes. My inclination was they are wrong, but I have 
come to see they staff change and adopt more ITIL like processes.  Also their 
supplier has certified that as being ITIL like compliant.  This is work mega 
bucks to them and worth all the pain it took to get there.
 
I think what is important here is that people choose a way of doing business 
and stick to it. In both of these cases it is IT aligning with the business, 
because the business told them to do so.
 
Does ITIL save money -- probably not, 
Does ITIL saving time -- probably not,
Does ITIL save energy -- not yet, we are still spinning wheels,
Does ITIL make your SOX compliant -- probably not,
Does ITIL make sense -- All the executives I have met think so.
 
To me, the complexity of ITSM 7 and all the rules and rigor can be 
counterproductive. It is definitely very costly. It is also important to 
remember that ITSM 7 is not a true Remedy/BMC product but a purchased one. 
Speculating, It was purchased to make the product ITIL compliant, which 
unfortunately with some tweaking the old one would have been too. We have to 
like with it until BMC can remove all the bugs and streamline it more.
 
 
John Rosquist
Windward Consulting

 
----- Original Message ----
From: Scott Parrish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 9:48:42 AM
Subject: Re: OT -- Sort Of: Computerworld reports on ITIL


No Norm, re-read your post. It begins:

100% correct. Not partially correct, not I agree with you that change costs
money Your statement is "100% correct". Which means you back his entire
post. Within that post Patrick makes the statements that I allude to below.
So again, you have gone beyond skepticism to stating fact and I would like
for you to produce the same documentation/case studies as you implore others
to provide.


Scott Parrish
IT Prophets, LLC
(770) 653-5203
http://www.itprophets.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kaiser Norm E CIV USAF 96 CS/SCCE
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 9:22 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: OT -- Sort Of: Computerworld reports on ITIL

Woah! Hold the phone! You've been fair in quoting me up until this
point.

> My point is, and I'll state it again, I believe it is irresponsible
for
people to make statements about something, such as ITIL in this
instance,
that they have no proof of. Norm stated that he thought Patrick's
comments
were 100% correct. Patrick's comments were that

1. ITIL doesn't save money
2. ITIL doesn't save time
3. ITIL doesn't save energy
4. ITL doesn't make sense

My exact word-for-word statement was this: "And Pat is right--all change
costs money at some point in the change process."

____________________________________________________________________________
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the
Answers Are"

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"


      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Luggage? GPS? Comic books? 
Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=graduation+gifts&cs=bz

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"

Reply via email to