I would go with Kaiser...

Do not create a record everytime it is modified.. Have a temp field to pull
the record ID if that record has already been created. So if that temp field
is not null do nothing else create that record if that temp field is null..

Cheers

Joe

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kaiser Norm E CIV USAF 96 CS/SCCE
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 2:11 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Unique ID?


Well how about instead of creating a record on each and every modify you
only create a record if a record for the desired time period does not
already exist?

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wheeler, Dylan
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 12:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Unique ID?

**
Yeah, that's the problem Ben.
Lets say they run a search for all the records that were modified between
09/01/2007 and 09/14/2007. A record could be modified 5 times on 5 different
days and so it would show up in the search 5 times. I just wish I could do a
distinct join, which it looks like I'm not being slow today, it's just not
possible without using a table field and direct sql.

It would be easy if I could just create them a report in crystal but there
are just too many user variables that they need to be able to input

Dylan

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Cantatore
        Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 10:30 AM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Re: Unique ID?


        **
        I honestly believe that hiding duplicates should be done at the
reporting level.  Create 2 groups, one for the ticket and the subgroup
would be the time increments (ie months, days, hours... whichever you're
trying to report on.)

        If you really insist that it be done on the form level, then I'd
modify your existing workflow.  Assuming days, meaning you don't care
for the time portion of the timestamp, I'd have the ticket/date only (no
timestamp) as the link between parent and child.  That way, if its a new
day or different incident, new record gets created.  Same day, same
incident, update the existing record.

        So the result is you can update incident xyz 15 times in a day,
and only one child record is recorded.  If you update that same incident
the next day, a new child recorded is created.

        Hope that helps,

        Ben Cantatore
        Remedy Administrator
        Avon
        (914) 935-2946



"Wheeler, Dylan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)"
<[email protected]>

09/28/2007 12:17 PM
Please respond to
[email protected]


To
[email protected]
cc
Subject
Unique ID?






        **
        Maybe it's too early in the day but I can't get my head wrapped
around a problem.
        A group here needs to keep track of when records in a form gets
modified. They want to be able to search for a date range and come up
with the records modified in that date range. Simple enough. The problem
I run into is if a record gets updated a month ago, then it gets updated
today. If they do their time search for the records that were updated a
month ago, it wont show in that list.
        So I created a table, every time the record gets modified it
pushes to a new table and creates a timestamp record. Created a join
form between the parent and the timestamp form. Works great except I
can't get it to show me only unique records. So if a record gets
modified twice in a time period, when they do their search on my join,
it will show two of that record.
        Am I going about this the wrong way?

        Like Joe I'm trying to stay away from the coffee and tea just
doesn't have that same bite heh

        -------------

        Dylan Wheeler
        Production Control Analyst Principal
        IT Operations
        Downey Savings & Loan Association, F.A.
        Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

        This message and any attachments are for the intended
recipient(s) only and may contain privileged, confidential and/or
proprietary information about Downey Savings or its customers, which
Downey Savings does not intend to disclose to the public. If you
received this message by mistake, please notify the sender by reply
e-mail and delete the message and attachments.
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.33/1034 - Release Date: 9/27/2007
5:00 PM

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"

Reply via email to