Dylan,

Could the "user variables" be put into an Advanced Search Bar syntax?

If so..
  a Menu could produce the list of unique values
OR
  table looping could reduce the list to unique values in a separate field

Just an idea...

-- 
Carey Matthew Black
Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP)
ARS = Action Request System(Remedy)

Love, then teach
Solution = People + Process + Tools
Fast, Accurate, Cheap.... Pick two.



On 9/28/07, Wheeler, Dylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> **
>
> Yeah,  that's the problem Ben.
> Lets  say they run a search for all the records that were modified between  
> 09/01/2007 and 09/14/2007. A record could be modified 5 times on 5  different 
> days and so it would show up in the search 5 times. I just wish I  could do a 
> distinct join, which it looks like I'm not being slow today, it's  just not 
> possible without using a table field and direct  sql.
>
> It  would be easy if I could just create them a report in crystal but there 
> are just  too many user variables that they need to be able to input
>
> Dylan

<snip>

>        "Wheeler, Dylan"          <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent by: "Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)"          
> <[email protected]>
>
> 09/28/2007 12:17 PM
>
> Please respond                to
> [email protected]
>
>
> To             [email protected]
>
> cc
>
>
> Subject             Unique          ID?
>
>
> **
> Maybe it's too early in the day but I can't    get my head wrapped around a 
> problem.
> A    group here needs to keep track of when records in a form gets modified. 
> They    want to be able to search for a date range and come up with the 
> records    modified in that date range. Simple enough. The problem I run into 
> is if a    record gets updated a month ago, then it gets updated today. If 
> they do their    time search for the records that were updated a month ago, 
> it wont show in    that list.
> So I created a table, every time    the record gets modified it pushes to a 
> new table and creates a timestamp    record. Created a join form between the 
> parent and the timestamp form. Works    great except I can't get it to show 
> me only unique records. So if a record    gets modified twice in a time 
> period, when they do their search on my join, it    will show two of that 
> record.
> Am I going    about this the wrong way?
>
> Like Joe I'm trying to stay away from the coffee and tea    just doesn't have 
> that same bite heh
>
> -------------
>
> Dylan Wheeler
> Production Control Analyst    Principal
> IT Operations
> Downey Savings & Loan Association, F.A.
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"

Reply via email to