Nope. The values are
"
> OH.. and the 'Status' field actually has two values now. ("Current"(0), and 
> "Disabled"(1)) ...
"

only 0 and 1. And the field is 'ID Enumeration' = "Linear" too.


But that reminds me about another related feature....

I also wonder if the user gets "locked out" due to the "Max Number of
Password Attempts" attempts if the 'Status' value is changed to
"Disabled". Ah.. but it looks like they did not do that either...

Configuring-710.pdf
Pg: 120
"
Enter the maximum number of consecutive bad password attempts a user
is allowed. If you enter 3, the user has 3 chances to log in. If all 3
attempts have bad passwords, the user account will be marked as
INVALID.

The allowed values for this field are 0 and all positive integers. A
value of 0 turns feature off. This setting can also be set with the
Max-Password-Attempts option in the ar.conf (ar.cfg) file.
"

And then also... earlier in the  doc it said this...

Pg: 84
"
To reset an invalid account, reset the user's password.
"

So I guess "Invalid" is not a status value... but maybe it should have been?

-- 
Carey Matthew Black
Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP)
ARS = Action Request System(Remedy)

Love, then teach
Solution = People + Process + Tools
Fast, Accurate, Cheap.... Pick two.



On 10/9/07, Hall Chad - chahal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the Status field on the User form, are the enum values set to 10 and
> 20? If not, it sounds like whoever wrote the new filter expected the
> Status field to use custom ID enumeration but the form never got
> modified for it.
>
> I hope the upgrade doesn't change the enum values on that form unless it
> also changes all workflow references as well. I've yet to see an upgrade
> that was diligent about cleaning up custom workflow related to core
> forms.
>
> Chad Hall
> (501) 342-2650
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carey Matthew Black
> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 10:50 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: v7.1 and the User/Group/Role forms w/ new stuff ( Standard
> WebServices, strange workflow...)
>
> All,
>
> I have started to look at a clean install (no existing db) of v7.1 in
> some detail and I have found a few interesting things.....
>
> Has anyone noticed the OOB Web Services that are in the base Server?
>
> I see three Public (Group access) web services:
>   User
>   Roles
>   Group
>
> The form permission for the forms are as such:
>   User: Public(hidden)
>   Group: Administrator (only)
>   Roles: Administrator (only)
>
> So the User Web Service and the form it points at (User) are Publicly
> accessible.
>
> However.... User's field 1 only has one group with access to it.  Drum
> role.... "AssigneeGroupAccess". (No I did not stutter.) Which turns
> out to be 'Group ID' = 60988. ( Field 2 and 4 no longer have access to
> the records unless their 'Login Names' are added to the 'Dynamic Group
> Access' (field ID 60988) field.
>
> Ok.. so the data should be safe by default. However this construct
> raises a few questions for me too...
>
>
> I wonder if the installer does the "super smart thing" and reviews the
> permissions on field 1 on the User form before the changes and adjust
> the permissions on the field 1 and/or the data in 'Dynamic Group
> Access' after the changes? Or maybe it will just stomp on the User
> form (like it has in previous upgrades and trash the customizations
> that customers have made to the permissions? (and then leave the
> existing data totally unaccessible to anyone except admin?)
>
> Has anyone attempted to upgrade an existing server to v7.1 and have
> had customizations to the permissions on the form/fields? (Any one
> know if the customizations were stepped on or maintained?)
>
>
> OH.. and the 'Status' field actually has two values now.
> ("Current"(0), and "Disabled"(1)) And there is an OOB filter
> (User:SetUserStatusCurrent) that test for "( 'Status' = 20) AND ...".
> So I doubt that filter will ever be true. :( Maybe some of the OOB
> apps add more 'Status' values to the User form?)
>
> Just wondering....
>
> --
> Carey Matthew Black
> Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP)
> ARS = Action Request System(Remedy)
>
> Love, then teach
> Solution = People + Process + Tools
> Fast, Accurate, Cheap.... Pick two.

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"

Reply via email to