Yes, probably by design. But seems like a dumb design... They adopt log4j, but does not use the std log levels...
-- Jarl On 10/8/07, Hugo Visser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ** Hm, the constant values start from 0 for INFO to 3 for FATAL, so it looks > like there is no lower level than INFO...(by design I guess)... > > Hugo > > > On 10/8/07, Jarl Grøneng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Why is there no DEBUG loglevel in the Java plugin api? > > > > This is whats accesible: > > PLUGIN_LOG_LEVEL_WARNING > > PLUGIN_LOG_LEVEL_INFO > > PLUGIN_LOG_LEVEL_FATAL > > PLUGIN_LOG_LEVEL_ERROR > > > > I really hope this is because someone forgotten to implement it... > > > > -- > > Jarl > > > > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where > the Answers Are" > > > > __20060125_______________________This posting was > submitted with HTML in it___ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
