Thanks for all of the info. We are on ITSM 6 so our prefetch isn't as bad
but I would still like to avoid it during production hours.

 

I will have to try out running multiple web servers instances and see how it
goes. I am almost tempted to leave IIS/ServletExec as the front since it is
already configured with SSL and PKI and run an instance of Tomcat for the
other apps but I certainly would like the performance boost from running MT
on pure Tomcat.

 

I'll keep a lookout for your updated postings.

 

Has anybody heard a timeframe for 7.1 patch 1?

 

Thanks,

Jason

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of strauss
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 11:18 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Version of Tomcat with Mid-Tier 7.1

 

** 

The biggest pitfall of using a single instance of a web server (IIS or
Tomcat) for both mid-tier and any of the other supporting applications is
the ability of the supporting application to crash the JVM or the entire web
server, forcing a restart in either case.  Any restart forces a prefetch,
which is an essential step in caching any application on the 7.x mid-tiers,
but while it is running you have degraded AR Server performance in any
client, especially the mid-tier.  ITSM 7 takes about 25-35 minutes to
prefetch depending on the number of installed modules - you don't want it
happening during production hours if you can help it.  If the restart is
from a crash, the 7.1 persistent prefetch is usually lost and a full
prefetch is performed.  I have all of the web apps installed on my dev web
server, and I have seen several occurrences of this happening there.

 

As a result, I have split out my other web apps to other machines than the
mid-tier server for the pre-production environment.  At a minimum I would
keep mid-tier separate because of the prefetch issues - it makes too big a
difference in initial response time to do without it - 1.5 _minutes_ to load
the Incident Console the first time versus 12 seconds if prefetched.  I
still need to move them all to SSL (easy for IIS - unknown for Tomcat) like
you, but as long as the mid-tier knows what port to access Crystal and RKM
on, it can present a united front for those applications.  The application
will also use whatever the correct port is for the Kinetic web in its
notifications.  A text web page like ours can and will serve up links to
each of the apps individually (mid-tier, RKM web, Kinetic web, ARSPerl CGI
scripts), but only the mid-tier delivered application (or User Tool) can
link some of them in as integrated pieces.

 

I'll have to update my postings after I rebuild and nail down all of the
server configurations for production - just finished putting a new DL380 G5
8-core 12 gb RAM server in the rack to put the AR server on - already have
one just like it for mid-tier.  I still have not decided whether to build
out with 7.1 (awaiting Patch 001) or bail out and use 7.0.01.005 instead
except for mid-tier.  There are way too many 7.1 specific problems right now
with the User Tool, Admin Tool, Import Tool and Data Management application
(just released one), the CCMCalendar, and integrations from ARSPerl and
Kinetic Calendar for my taste.

Christopher Strauss, Ph.D.
Call Tracking Administration Manager
University of North Texas Computing & IT Center
http://itsm.unt.edu/ 

 

 

  _____  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Miller
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 10:24 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Version of Tomcat with Mid-Tier 7.1

** 

Hi Christopher,

 

On a bit different note. I have been following your posts (or at least
trying to) throughout the year regarding all of the different
requirements/configurations for various apps that require a JSP engine.  We
have a number of the same apps as you:

 

MT 7.0.01 (7.1 soon)

Crystal Server XI

Kinetic Survey (Lite)

RKM

 

Out of those we are currently only using MT on IIS with SerletExec 5.0.0.10
and are looking to implement Crystal Server next. We have been planning on
removing IIS and using Tomcat for the web server and application server when
we move to MT 7.1 since Crystal Server is not supported with ServletExec.

 

In an email from you on 7/18/07 with the subject "Crystal Report Server XI
vs Business Objects Enterprise XI CMS & Tomcat question. (UNCLASSIFIED)" you
mentioned using IIS and .NET for Crystal Server and Tomcat for MT. That
sounds like an interesting solution but to make our setup more complicated
everything customer facing has to be over SSL/443 and require a PKI
certificate from the user before any access is granted. I am figuring that
will make using IIS and Tomcat on the same machine kind of hard.  Also the
idea of using separate Tomcat instances is interesting (apparently almost
necessary with MT and RKM) but then we are up against the requirement to use
port 443 again.

 

Is there some magical way to run different app servers on different ports
and pass all of the user interfaces through one main web server on port 443?

 

It looks like the packaged Tomcat 5.5.17 with MT will also run RKM and
Kinetic Survey, does this sound right? 

 

I haven't been able to find any place that states Crystal Server is
supported on Tomcat 5.5, only up to 5.0. Is the situation that there is
still no common application server for all of these products? 

 

I am really hoping to keep our server count to a minimum. Do I have any hope
of utilizing 1 server for all of these apps? Do you have any suggestions as
how to utilize all of these products with minimal servers (physical and
virtual)?

 

Thanks,

Jason

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of strauss
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 12:28 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Version of Tomcat with Mid-Tier 7.1

 

** 

It is still bundling Tomcat 5.5.17, but you should use JRE 1.5.0_12 for all
things 7.1.  Beware the 7.1 mid-tier installer on Windows x64 - it is too
stupid to know that the Apache Tomcat install should go in the Program Files
(x86) directory on a fresh install, but it runs anyway.  This was not a
problem on 7.0.01.x

Christopher Strauss, Ph.D.
Call Tracking Administration Manager
University of North Texas Computing & IT Center
http://itsm.unt.edu/ 

 

 

  _____  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Miller
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 2:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Version of Tomcat with Mid-Tier 7.1

** 

**

Can anybody out there tell me the version of Tomcat (web server and JSP
engine if they are different) that is bundled with MT 7.1?

 

Thanks,

Jason

__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ 

__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ 

__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ 

__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ 


_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to