Sorry Wesley ... just had lunch.. .and somehow started reading my email
downward and missed this one :)
Thanks for the comments.
Wesley Schwengle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
On 07.02.08 10:48 Frex Popo wrote:
> If you have to choose between IIS and Apache which one would you opt for? I
> mean in term of ease of administration, performance, security .. we are
> planning to install this in a clustered environment with load balancing
> software and would like to know if you had issues if any with running
> Mid-Tier against IIS or Apache?
I would use Apache, since you can use this on both Windows and Unix. IIS
is only available for Windows. And since we are running ARS on Unix, the
choice is obvious.
The great plus is that with using Apache is that you can change from a
Unix to Windows (or vice versa) and keep your Apache configuration file.
Some adjustments are needed due to different pathnames c:\path/to/dir
vs /path/to/dir. And also modules which are loaded LoadModule
mod_something.dll vs mod_something.so. But these changes are trivial.
IMO Apache is easier to configure, but IIS admins might disagree on
this.
Cheers,
Wesley
_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
---------------------------------
Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail
_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
