Since I had to customize the search dialog to search on Corporate ID and
Login ID since the OOTB code failed to do that (and previous 4.x and
5.5x ITSM apps we used here all did), I added those fields to the search
qualification, which makes it MUCH more specific.
 
( 'Company' LIKE ( $z1D Char01$ +  "%" )) AND ( 'Last Name' LIKE ( $z1D
Char02$ +  "%" )) AND ( 'First Name' LIKE ( $z1D Char03$ +  "%" )) AND (
'Phone Number Business' LIKE (( "%"  + $z1D Char04$) +  "%" )) AND (
'Remedy Login ID' LIKE $z1D Char22$) AND ( 'Corporate ID' LIKE $z1D
Char23$)
 
Guess I could have cleaned it up some more, but I have not seen it
select the wrong customer with these qualifications.

Christopher Strauss, Ph.D.
Call Tracking Administration Manager
University of North Texas Computing & IT Center
http://itsm.unt.edu/ 

 


  _____  

        From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J.T. Shyman
        Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 3:28 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Re: IM 7.x Bug - Need someone to check patch 6 or 7
        
        
        ** 

        Looks like it is still that way in IM 7.0.3 Patch 007. The Set
Field If on the 2nd set fields action in the active link is:

         

        ( 'Company' LIKE ( $z1D Char01$ +  "%" )) AND ( 'Last Name' LIKE
( $z1D Char02$ +  "%" )) AND ( 'First Name' LIKE ( $z1D Char03$ +  "%"
)) AND ( 'Phone Number Business' LIKE (( "%"  + $z1D Char04$) +  "%" ))

         

        J.T. Shyman 
        Column Technologies 

          

        
  _____  


        From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Rentfrow
        Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 4:05 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: IM 7.x Bug - Need someone to check patch 6 or 7

         

        In IM 7.02 patch 2 we have the following problem - I need
someone to verify if it exists in Patch 6 or 7 of IM 7.0x since  I don't
have a server free to install on right now.  Read below for more
details.

         

        If you have two (or more) customer (CTM:People) records with the
exact same name AND the same phone # (e.g., unknown "###") but different
email addresses (i.e., actually different people) and you do a search
from the Incident screen you are given the results in the People Search
form.

         

        If you select the first one you're fine.

         

        If you select the second or later one the system selects the
first one anyway.  This is because the workflow HPD:INC:PCS_100_Search
does something really, really stupid.  It selects the customer record
for the incident based off of "Like" query using:

        -Company

        -First name

        -Last name

        -Phone number

         

        Why this doesn't just use the People ID is beyond me - this is
really sloppy.  It's also a very inefficient query.

         

        That said - can someone with a patch 6 or 7 install check that
active link and see if the second "Set Fields" action is still a LIKE
query?

         

        William Rentfrow, Principal Consultant

        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

        C 701-306-6157

        O 952-432-0227

         

        __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the
Answers Are" html___ __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist:
"Where the Answers Are" html___


_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to