Thanks!  I've only been here 2 weeks, and I don't yet have DB access, so
I couldn't look there.  That's a huge help, thank you!

 

Chris

________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe D'Souza
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 3:12 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Tracking an error by number alone 1441186

 

Message numbers in that range are generally out of the box filters.. In
your case the filter name is CHG:CRQ:ValidateChgImp_186 that causes that
error. You can find it on your system with 2 simple queries..

select filterid from filter_message where msgnum = 1441186;

 

Once you get the filterid, use that in the second query

select name, filterid from filter where filterid = <filterid>;

 

Or you could also run

select distinct name, filter.filterid from filter, filter_message where
filter.filterid = (select filterid from filter_message where msgnum =
1441186);

 

Joe

 

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Moore, Christopher Allen
        Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 3:45 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Tracking an error by number alone 1441186

        ** 

        Hey everyone-

         

        Before I got here, they had a requirement to hide the change
implementer assignment fields in CHG:Infrastructure Change.  That was
causing problems however when we would try and set people to non-support
staff and they had been set as a change implementer in the hidden field-
they were assigned tickets and didn't know it and they had to be
reassigned before their People record could change.

         

        I un-hid the fields for administrators, but rather than tracking
down all the workflow to set and check those fields and turning them
off, I created a filter that fired on modify and save to null them out,
with an execution order of 600.  I made that change last Friday and
since almost 200 change tickets have been created and everything worked
fine.

         

        However today someone was trying to modify a change and was
unable to.  He got the error "The selected change implementer is
invalid.  Please reselect the change implementer from the menu and then
reapply. ARERR 1441186".   Specifically, he added a work note and hit
save.  That error is not from workflow I created, and I am trying to
find out where it comes from.

         

        That number is too high to be from one of the OOTB errors (I
think).  It seems like it must be an error created in custom work, but
the developers who set the system up are not available.  I turned off
the filter I made and it stopped the problem from occurring, however I
cannot reproduce the error in dev and I didn't get a chance to log it on
production.  I can't turn it back on in production- it's a high
availability 24/7 implementation.

         

        How can I find the workflow bit where that error comes from
based only on that number?

         

        Thanks,

        Chris

__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
html___

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to