Thanks for confirming my suspicions Rebecca and Fred - issue RESOLVED - FYI to All - don't make the same mistake I did - trying to add a 0 length char field as a column in a table field.. DOH!!!!!!!!! :)
Thanks!!!!! :):):) Jase On 6/17/08, Grooms, Frederick W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ** I know in 6.3 you are not able to add a column larger than 255 > characters to a table field. I thought 7.1 had the same restriction. > > Fred > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Jase Brandon > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 17, 2008 11:06 AM > *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > *Subject:* Zero Lengh Char Field as a Table Field Column > > > Hello All, > > We created a customization for ARS 7.1 patch 002 so we could "Email By > Site". > > Without boring everyone to death with a superdiatribe, can anyone tell me > if my below suspicion is correct? > > I have a zero length char field represented as a column on a table field, > everytime you try to view the record, remedy client locks up and dies. > > "I think by design if you have a field that allows unlimited data in it, > you are not supposed to represent that field in a column on a table field. " > Correct? > > Thanks in Advance, > > Jase > > > __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" > html___ > _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
