And even in that situation I have seen the column drop off the table because it is no longer under 255.
Jason On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 9:55 AM, LJ Longwing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ** I think you are correct...you must have added it before it was 0 > length, and then increased it....because you can't add 0 length fields as > columns. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Jase Brandon > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 17, 2008 10:06 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Zero Lengh Char Field as a Table Field Column > > ** Hello All, > > We created a customization for ARS 7.1 patch 002 so we could "Email By > Site". > > Without boring everyone to death with a superdiatribe, can anyone tell me > if my below suspicion is correct? > > I have a zero length char field represented as a column on a table field, > everytime you try to view the record, remedy client locks up and dies. > > "I think by design if you have a field that allows unlimited data in it, > you are not supposed to represent that field in a column on a table field. " > Correct? > > Thanks in Advance, > > Jase > __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" > html___ > __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" > html___ > _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
