It is possible to put multiple instance on one box; however, you must manage
which server is running escalations, email, admin, etc manually. You can
manage which users are connected to each machine by using a load balancer.

That said, there is still one major draw back - this will only work with
fixed licenses.  6.3 licenses have the server host id/nic as part of the
key.

On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Axton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Reasons I see why it won't work:
> - tcp ports can not be shared on a single interface; you can not load
> balance two servers on the same host
>
> Reasons why you don't want to point two servers to the same db and not
> use server groups:
> - subsystems will be running twice - escalation server, email engine,
> approval server, etc.
> - two admin threads - there will be concurrency issues should there be
> a collision
>
> Could you share more about what you are trying to accomplish.
> Arserver is multi-threaded in how it handles most types of operations;
> the exceptions being the admin thread and the escalation thread (prior
> to 7.1).  Context switching is going to be faster between threads than
> it will with processes in most cases; with that in mind, you will have
> greater throughput on a single host running a single instance of
> arserver on one host that running multiple instances of arserver on
> the same host.
>
> Axton Grams
>
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 9:31 AM, LJ Longwing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I believe what David was saying is that if you have two Remedy servers
> > pointing at the same DB, then the only supported method of doing that is
> > with a server group.  The reason behind this is that is the only way to
> > ensure that the servers don't step on each other.  And Remedy doesn't
> > support two Remedy servers located on the same machine, in a server group
> > (the only supported way to point both to the same db).  So in
> short....you
> > can't do what you are trying to do.  If you want multiple Remedy's
> pointing
> > to the same DB, they need to be on separate machines, if you want them on
> > the same machine, you need to point them to separate DB's.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Icarus4
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 4:01 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: Multiple Instance of ARS 6.3 on Shared database
> >
> > There is no server group. It is another ARS instance on the same hardware
> > box sharing one single database.
> >
> > I'm just wondering if performance would be better if we separate all
> admin
> > duties on a separate instance. I know it will not change the fact that
> > database objects will be locked during edition by the admin instance and
> > that the other instance will have to wait, but I thought maybe server
> > resources would be used more efficiently this way.
> >
> > That's the kind of comparison I'm looking for. We currently don't have a
> dev
> > box where I could perform some load testings that would show something.
> >
> >
> > Easter, David wrote:
> >>
> >>> Instances will share the same database.
> >>
> >> One thing to consider is that "sharing the same database" appears to
> >> imply that you'll be putting both instances into the same server group
> >> - and server groups aren't supported for multiple instances on the
> >> same physical server.
> >>
> >> -David J. Easter
> >> Sr. Product Manager, Solution Strategy and Development BMC Software,
> >> Inc.
> >>
> >> The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed
> >> in this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc.
> >> My voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a
> >> role as a spokesperson, liaison or public relations representative for
> >> BMC Software, Inc.
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Icarus4
> >> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 6:05 AM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Multiple Instance of ARS 6.3 on Shared database
> >>
> >> Hello listers,
> >>
> >> I'm considering installing multiple instance of ARS 6.3 on the same box.
> >> Instances will share the same database.
> >>
> >> Anyone did a performance comparison between single and multiple
> >> instances?
> >> Does it bring a better usage of the server resources?
> >>
> >> Thanks for sharing.
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >> http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-Instance-of-ARS-6.3-on-Shared-database-
> >> tp
> >> 19414834p19414834.html
> >> Sent from the ARS (Action Request System) mailing list archive at
> >> Nabble.com.
> >>
> >> ______________________________________________________________________
> >> __
> >> _______
> >> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum
> >> Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
> >>
> >> ______________________________________________________________________
> >> _________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> >> Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-Instance-of-ARS-6.3-on-Shared-database-tp1941
> > 4834p19508803.html
> > Sent from the ARS (Action Request System) mailing list archive at
> > Nabble.com.
> >
> >
> ____________________________________________________________________________
> > ___
> > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum
> Sponsor:
> > www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> > Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
>  UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
>

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to