Ok....granted...I have never tried a push to a dynamic form, static field...and then use a setfield with the Copy-Field-Value...I'd never considered doing it in that particular combination. Sounds a bit like a backhanded way of doing it....but you're right...would likely work...if you did a push of two fields into tmp fields...the value you want to set, and the field you want to set it into....and then have a filter on destination that takes the value and copies it to that field....yea that would work...:) Thank you Carey...puts another tool in my bag...:)
-----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carey Matthew Black Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 9:27 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Verify Query and Field values LJ, Uh.. maybe you can... (You did not mention what ARS version your using... but I think this function may also be in 6.3, but not "Supported yet". ) Have you looked at this special run process ? Ref: Workflow-Objects-710.pdf , Pg 204. " Application-Copy-Field-Value <target_field_ID> <source_field_ID> Copies a field on the current form to another field on the current form. Returns one of the following integers: 1-Indicates that the assignment failed. 0-Indicates that the assignment occurred. " Yes this does not do a "Push" to the target form. However that can be done to a dynamic form name. You just need to set up a message bus that allows you to send one (or if you get really crazy more than one in the same push actions) field value change to the target record(s) and have filters on the targets that parse the message and set the local fields during the Modify. -- Carey Matthew Black Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP) ARS = Action Request System(Remedy) Love, then teach Solution = People + Process + Tools Fast, Accurate, Cheap.... Pick two. On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 7:43 PM, LJ Longwing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nevermind....Got it...:)....This is for anyone else who wants to do > something similar <snip> > Oh...and in case anyone is wondering why I'm doing this....I need to > be able to set a dynamic field, on a dynamic form with a dynamic > value. I can't do this with advanced workflow because the field ID > can't be dynamic...:)...just working around limitations of the > app....this will allow me to specify via workflow what form I want the > update to be performed on, with what qual, and set a dynamic field > with a verified valid value....very nice...because I was doing this > through direct SQL previously...which I didn't like doing. ____________________________________________________________________________ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"