Bravo Susan!  I couldn't have said it better myself!  
 
Go FAT!
 
What a bunch of sizeists!

________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Susan Palmer
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 12:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?


** 
Since '95 I don't recall Remedy ever referring to it as the FAT client.
Whenever I heard the term I thought it was an old geek term especially
once web became more prolific.  And as with most THIN clients in the
past they did not have the full abilities of the FAT client which was
many times overlooked since often THIN seemed to be preferred.  But many
people realized that the FAT client was more fulfilling and rewarding.
Now THIN client has improved but will never be quite as good as the FAT
client but many will continue to overlook that.  Go FAT !!
 
Susan .... :)


On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Shyman, Jonathan <[email protected]>
wrote:


        ** 

        No, see, that's no good beacuse it infers the existence of a
"smart" client.
        
        You know, a client that will fill out most of the fields on a
form for you, get you coffee, ask your boss for a raise and tell you it
can't open the pod bay doors now.
        
        :)
        
        J.T. Shyman 



        -----Original Message-----
        From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) on behalf
of Reiser, John J
        Sent: Fri 4/17/2009 9:38 AM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
        
        How about the dumb client? ARText Ver 1.5
        
        ---
        John J. Reiser
        Senior Software Development Analyst
        Remedy Administrator/Developer
        Lockheed Martin - MS2
        The star that burns twice as bright burns half as long.
        Pay close attention and be illuminated by its brilliance. -
paraphrased by me
        -----Original Message-----
        From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Carey Matthew Black
        Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 7:43 AM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
        
        Axton,
        
        I think I was more like this:
        
        RemedyWeb was the "thick web client" (applet based), (AKA "Fat
web client")
        
        ARWeb was the "thin web client" (DHTML/Javascript based)
        
        WUT was the v4 Windows User Tool (Maybe also called the "FAT
client".
        Note it is fatter than the Fat web client by two more capital
sized
        letters.)
        
        You also had to deal with the UUT. (Un*x User Tool). However,
you
        might also have called it the "OMUT" OSF/Motif User Tool too.
But as I
        only used it a few times I really do not want to try to remember
it in
        a negative way. Rather I will choose to focus on the positive
        memories.... It's dead.
        
        Then you also had to deal with the MUT. (Macintosh User Tool,
was that
        v3? or just v2?) Which I would call a "FAt client". (Not quite
as fat
        as the "FAT client", but fatter than the Fat web client by one
capital
        letter.)
        
        Did I forget any clients? I thought that there was an ARS Shell
out
        there too, but I can not seem to find it right now. :(
        
        [ It is Friday right? :) ]
        
        --
        Carey Matthew Black
        BMC Remedy AR System Skilled Professional (RSP)
        ARS = Action Request System(Remedy)
        
        Love, then teach
        Solution = People + Process + Tools
        Fast, Accurate, Cheap.... Pick two.
        
        
        
        On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Axton <[email protected]>
wrote:
        > ** I've used thick client/thin client to differentiate the
clients.  But
        > that was back in the days of arweb/remedy web (did I get that
right; the
        > cobwebs are getting thick).
        >
        > Axton
        >
        > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Chowdhury, Tauf
<[email protected]>
        > wrote:
        >>
        >> Why is it FAT client? Why couldn't it be Chubby Client or
Portly Client or
        >> even Big Boned Client? :)
        >>
        >> Tauf Chowdhury
        
        
________________________________________________________________________
_______
        UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
<http://www.arslist.org/> 
        Platinum Sponsor:[email protected]
<mailto:sponsor%[email protected]>  ARSlist: "Where the Answers
Are"
        
        
________________________________________________________________________
_______
        UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
<http://www.arslist.org/> 
        Platinum Sponsor:[email protected]
<mailto:sponsor%[email protected]>  ARSlist: "Where the Answers
Are"
        
        

        

        

        _Platinum Sponsor: [email protected] ARSlist: "Where the
Answers Are"_


_Platinum Sponsor: [email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers
Are"_ 

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:[email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to