I see no value in not deleting from the original source. I know that
option is available but I could never understand why you would want to
do that. I am sure there are some who could justify it. We just don't do
it. We delete from Source after coping to the Archive.

 

Christopher Pruitt
Consultant Specialist 
EDS, an HP Company
mailto: christopher.pru...@eds.com 

We deliver on our commitments 
so you can deliver on yours. 

Confidentiality Notice: This message and any files transmitted with it
are intended for the sole use of the entity or individual to whom it is
addressed, and may contain information that is confidential, privileged,
and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the
intended addressee for this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any
copying, distribution, or dissemination of this e-mail is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
immediately destroy, erase, or discard this message. Please notify the
sender immediately by return e-mail if you have received this e-mail by
mistake.

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of SUBSCRIBE arslist Melissa
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 9:41 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Archiving and reporting/searching?

 

** 
Thanks for the info Chris.  I would assume we would do the archive to
delete from original.  What is the value of archiving, but not deleting?
(maybe I'm missing something).  Wouldn't it still search all the data in
the original form if it weren't deleted? 





"Pruitt, Christopher J" <christopher.pru...@eds.com> 
Sent by: "Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)"
<arslist@ARSLIST.ORG> 

06/10/2009 09:32 AM 

Please respond to
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG

To

arslist@ARSLIST.ORG 

cc

        
Subject

Re: Archiving and reporting/searching?

 

                




If you are using the imbedded Archiving solution for AR System and you
are doing an Archive Type of 'Copy to Archive', then creating a join
does not make since because the data would still be in the original data
form, so no need to a join. However, it you are doing a 'Copy to Archive
and Delete form Source' then building a join is a good idea, however,
doing a Join and choosing "Request ID" as the join criteria would not
work. 

The problem is when the data moves to the Archive form the "Request ID"
form the original data form is copied into a field called " Original
Request ID" and the "Request ID" on the Archive form would never match
the "Request ID" on the Original data form, as it gets a new "Request
ID" when the record is moved to the Archive.  Second, for a join on
fields to work there has to be matching data in those fields on both
forms. 

What we did was to include a field called "Form Name" that held the name
of the original data form in it and then we did the join criteria on
that field.  However, you really need to be careful on doing reports off
of this join form. I will give you duplicates.

For example on one of the Data form to Archive form joins we have the
following counts:

A_Test_Data:                 4,450,400
A_Test_Archive:                 34
A_Test_JN:                 151,313,600

If you do the math the 151,313,600 equals 4,450,400 x 34. So you really
need to make sure when you are doing reports to use a lot of
qualifications to eliminate getting duplicate records returned.



Christopher Pruitt
Consultant Specialist 
EDS, an HP Company
mailto: christopher.pru...@eds.com 
We deliver on our commitments 
so you can deliver on yours. 
Confidentiality Notice: This message and any files transmitted with it
are intended for the sole use of the entity or individual to whom it is
addressed, and may contain information that is confidential, privileged,
and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the
intended addressee for this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any
copying, distribution, or dissemination of this e-mail is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
immediately destroy, erase, or discard this message. Please notify the
sender immediately by return e-mail if you have received this e-mail by
mistake.

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of jham36
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 4:13 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Archiving and reporting/searching?

I don't think it matters.  You can choose any field.
I have not tested it, but it should work and should be easy for you to
test.  I would choose RequestID as the join criteria and an inner
join.

On Jun 9, 4:41 pm, SUBSCRIBE arslist Melissa
<melissa.r...@stls.frb.org> wrote:
> What would you use as the join critieria?
>
> jham36 <jha...@gmail.com>
> Sent by: "Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)"
> <arsl...@arslist.org>
> 06/09/2009 03:39 PM
> Please respond to
> arsl...@arslist.org
>
> To
> arsl...@arslist.org
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: Archiving and reporting/searching?
>
> How about a join form between the live data and the archived data?
> Perform all searches and reports against that.
>
> James
>
> On Jun 9, 3:32 pm, SUBSCRIBE arslist
Melissa<melissa.r...@stls.frb.org> wrote:
> > We are starting to look into how to handle archiving and are running
> into
> > road blocks with how to be able to search/report on all the data,
but
> > still archive old data.  What are other organizations doing?  Does
> anyone
> > have any white papers or such they can share?  We are using ARS 7.1.
>
> > TIA!
> > Melissa
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
_______> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives atwww.arslist.org
> > Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the
Answers
>
> Are"
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
_______
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives atwww.arslist.org
> Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers
Are"
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
_______
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives atwww.arslist.org
> Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers
Are"

________________________________________________________________________
_______
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers
Are"

________________________________________________________________________
_______
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers
Are"

_Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers
Are"_


_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to