> No, you're not missing anything. I completely agree with you; it's a > bit lacking in its current implementation. I think it would be much > more useful if auditing included both the old and the new value. > However the auditing as it is currently designed only records the > new value. You would have to get the previous value by finding when > it was set to the previous value in a prior log entry.
Oh well, back to writing a giant stack of filters, then. Alan _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:[email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
