Tell me if this makes sense: Source: Server Group A (Class: BMC_Cluster) Destination: Server1 , Server2, Server3, and so on... (Class: BMC:ComputerSystem) Relationship Type: BMC_MemberOfCollection
Or should the relationship type be BMC_Component ??? Thanks all From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of DCI Remedy Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 1:52 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: collection of servers ** I think you could also use Cluster. Class that stores information about groups of two or more computer systems (clusters) or applications that operate together as a functional whole to increase the performance or resources of the BMC_System component. Use the BMC_Cluster class to classify or update groups of software or hardware to maintain and improve the reliability, serviceability, and availability of your operating-system environment. For example, an accounting department might create a cluster and link it with relationships to specific computer systems to obtain a complete picture of their business environment and assess the performance of computers individually and collectively. To do so, they could use the BMC_Component relationship to connect Computer A, Computer B, and Computer C to a performance measurement CI in the BMC_Cluster class. This class corresponds to the DMTF class CIM_Cluster. Thanks Edward On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Tommy Morris <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Duh... hit send too quickly. Then all you have to do is relate the Application Service to the CRQ instead of individual servers. -----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Martinez, Marcelo A Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 1:36 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: collection of servers Hello List, I've been asked if it is possible to create a "group of servers" (i.e. 50 servers) and assign it a group name (i.e. group A) that could be used in Change Management when relating assets. I already have these servers loaded into my CMDB. The goal is for users to create a change ticket and relate "group A" to the change ticket. if others wanted to get a list of servers affected by this change, they would need to open the group in the CI Viewer (maybe). Not sure if this makes sense? What would be the best approach to accomplish this? Thanks, Marcelo Martinez ________________________________________________________________________ _______ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org<http://www.arslist.org/> Platinum Sponsor:[email protected]<mailto:sponsor%[email protected]> ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org<http://www.arslist.org/> Platinum Sponsor:[email protected]<mailto:sponsor%[email protected]> ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" _Platinum Sponsor: [email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:[email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
