Based on the definition and example for Cluster, I think the Component relationship is the way to go.
Hope that helps. Ed On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Martinez, Marcelo A <[email protected]>wrote: > ** > > Tell me if this makes sense: > > Source: Server Group A (Class: BMC_Cluster) > > Destination: Server1 , Server2, Server3, and so on… (Class: > BMC:ComputerSystem) > > Relationship Type: BMC_MemberOfCollection > > > > Or should the relationship type be BMC_Component ??? > > > > Thanks all > > > > > > *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *DCI Remedy > *Sent:* Thursday, January 07, 2010 1:52 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: collection of servers > > > > ** > > I think you could also use Cluster. > > > > Class that stores information about groups of two or more computer systems > (clusters) or applications that operate together as a functional whole to > increase the performance or resources of the BMC_System component. Use the > BMC_Cluster class to classify or update groups of software or hardware to > maintain and improve the reliability, serviceability, and availability of > your operating-system environment. For example, an accounting department > might create a cluster and link it with relationships to specific computer > systems to obtain a complete picture of their business environment and > assess the performance of computers individually and collectively. To do so, > they could use the BMC_Component relationship to connect Computer A, > Computer B, and Computer C to a performance measurement CI in the > BMC_Cluster class. This class corresponds to the DMTF class CIM_Cluster. > > Thanks > > > > Edward > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Tommy Morris <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Duh... hit send too quickly. Then all you have to do is relate the > Application Service to the CRQ instead of individual servers. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Martinez, Marcelo A > Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 1:36 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: collection of servers > > Hello List, > > I've been asked if it is possible to create a "group of servers" (i.e. > 50 servers) and assign it a group name (i.e. group A) that could be used > in Change Management when relating assets. I already have these servers > loaded into my CMDB. > The goal is for users to create a change ticket and relate "group A" to > the change ticket. if others wanted to get a list of servers affected by > this change, they would need to open the group in the CI Viewer (maybe). > Not sure if this makes sense? > > What would be the best approach to accomplish this? > > Thanks, > > Marcelo Martinez > > ________________________________________________________________________ > _______ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org > Platinum > Sponsor:[email protected]<sponsor%[email protected]>ARSlist: > "Where the Answers > Are" > > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org > Platinum > Sponsor:[email protected]<sponsor%[email protected]>ARSlist: > "Where the Answers Are" > > > _Platinum Sponsor: [email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers > Are"_ > _Platinum Sponsor: [email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers > Are"_ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:[email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
