I do not see the benefit of upgrading the server first at all.

In my opinion, if there is anything that can break it could happen if you
upgrade the server first.. Web service integration I think could be one of
the things you could risk by upgrading the server first... Simple example
could be the version where web services were first introduced (5.5??). What
if you upgraded the server first and then try to set up web services? Would
it work? Even now I bet there is a chance web services if setup could fail
if the mid tier version is below the server version..

Joe
  -----Original Message-----
  From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[email protected]]on Behalf Of Pargeter, Christie :CO IS
  Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 2:07 PM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: MidTier & ARS Upgrade Paths


  **
  No, this guy's customer service was AWFUL.  He kept interrupting me, tell
me I was wrong and I should never upgrade the client first.  I really didn't
have a lot of confidence in any answer from him about why this version was
that different.  I double checked the Technical Bulletin from the 7.5 p 5
and it doesn't say anything about not working with ARS 7.1.  So, I am now in
the process of downgrading my MidTier from 7.5 p 5 to 7.5 p 3.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
  From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe D'Souza
  Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 11:03 AM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: MidTier & ARS Upgrade Paths


  **
  Christie,

  The MT is a client so yes it is a better idea to upgrade it before the
server. The reason being that if the server offers a new piece of
functionality on the client, the client will not be able to take advantage
of that functionality until its upgraded.. Upgrading the client before the
server, will mean that the client can access every functionality of the
server application of the previous version.. I wouldn't keep a gap of more
than a version though. Backward compatibility is perhaps better tested on
one version by software manufacturers..

  Perhaps IE 7 has an issue with the latest and the greatest MT version,
which is why BMC told you what they did,. Did you ask them the reason why
they recommended something like that which I agree is generally in direct
contradiction to what they generally recommend..

  Joe
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[email protected]]on Behalf Of Pargeter, Christie :CO IS
    Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 1:40 PM
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: MidTier & ARS Upgrade Paths


    **
    Hi All - I wanted to validate some information since MidTier came out I
have always upgraded my MidTier before upgrading ARS.  Is this still the
case?  Can I upgrade Midtier from 7.1 p 6 to 7.5 p 5 or do I have to upgrade
my ARS first?  The reason I am asking is that I upgraded my dev server to
MidTier 7.5 p 5 and I am having an IE 7 issue so I was told by BMC not to
install the latest patch of the MidTier client.  This is very
counterintuitive of everything I have ever been told by BMC.  They seem to
usually want me to install the latest patch before they try anything else.

    ARS 7.1 p 6
    ITSM 7.0.3 p 9
    Window 2003
    MS SQ 2005
    IIS/Tomcat
    RKM 7.2 p 2
    MidTier 7.1 p 6


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Christie Pargeter
    Legacy HealthIS - Programming
    SR Technical Analyst
    [email protected]   1120 Building
          tel: 503-415-5149

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to