OT: At least you get a swiveling chari ;-P

Den 05-08-2011 23:25, patrick zandi skrev:
** Huh ! I must be getting ripped, I have always been told by my boss, see that chair? "Yes sir" ... It Swivels..


On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Jonas Stumph Stevnsvig <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    **
    My previous place of employment had similar protocols. To ensure
    quality, We had four environments:
    Development, which is the ONLY environment on which the Devs have
    admin rights.
    Test, which is in theory the Admin's olayground - a place to test
    patches, and so on, so that the Admin does not obstruct the DEVs work.
    Pre-Production, which was used for End-user accept testing before
    production.
    and of course, Production.

    Besides this, we used object reservation on all servers, with
    system forms locked by a per-server account, to prevent accidental
    modification (we had a strict policy of not altering system forms).
    The different tiers also means that basic things such as user
    privileges and server configuration changes are well described,
    since the Devs are forced to test on environments where they have
    no admin rights.

    We had one further modification; all the Admin forms the Devs
    would need access to in order to troubleshoot were given an extra
    permission group, which the Devs would get on their PRod user.

    Hope this is inspiration.

    best regards,

    Jonas Stevnsvig

    Den 05-08-2011 21:31, Arner, Todd skrev:
    **

    We have been given a directive to separate the Remedy Development
    and Administrative functions.  Basically, we have been instructed
    to come up with a way to ensure that no one person can make
development changes and also be able to set up users accounts. We currently split the roles between two groups so that no one
    person is doing both, however, since the developers and admins
    have Administrator privileges, there is nothing stopping either
    from performing all functions.

    Does anyone else out there have a similar requirement?  If so,
    can you share your solution?

    I am just not seeing a way to do this.  Or maybe I just don't
    want to see the way. :)  Seems to me both rolls need to have
    Administrator privileges to complete their tasks.

    Any insight is greatly appreciated.

    ARS 7.5 p7
    MS SQL 2005
    Windows 2003 SP2

    Thanks,
    Todd Arner
    Great Lakes

    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is 
intended
    only for the use of the recipient(s) named above, and may be legally
    privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, 
you
    are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
    communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited.  If you have
    received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately 
and
    destroy or delete the original message and any copy of it from your computer
    system.  If you have any questions concerning this message, please contact 
the
    sender.
    
================================================================================
    _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com <http://www.wwrug.com> ARSlist:
"Where the Answers Are"_

    _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com <http://www.wwrug.com> ARSlist:
    "Where the Answers Are"_




--
Patrick Zandi
_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_


_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to