Yeah...but you work for Campbell!!!!! :-)
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 5:25 PM, patrick zandi <remedy...@gmail.com> wrote: > ** Huh ! I must be getting ripped, I have always been told by my boss, see > that chair? "Yes sir" ... It Swivels.. > > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Jonas Stumph Stevnsvig < > arsl...@stevnsvig.com> wrote: > >> ** >> My previous place of employment had similar protocols. To ensure quality, >> We had four environments: >> Development, which is the ONLY environment on which the Devs have admin >> rights. >> Test, which is in theory the Admin's olayground - a place to test patches, >> and so on, so that the Admin does not obstruct the DEVs work. >> Pre-Production, which was used for End-user accept testing before >> production. >> and of course, Production. >> >> Besides this, we used object reservation on all servers, with system forms >> locked by a per-server account, to prevent accidental modification (we had a >> strict policy of not altering system forms). >> The different tiers also means that basic things such as user privileges >> and server configuration changes are well described, since the Devs are >> forced to test on environments where they have no admin rights. >> >> We had one further modification; all the Admin forms the Devs would need >> access to in order to troubleshoot were given an extra permission group, >> which the Devs would get on their PRod user. >> >> Hope this is inspiration. >> >> best regards, >> >> Jonas Stevnsvig >> >> Den 05-08-2011 21:31, Arner, Todd skrev: >> >> ** >> >> We have been given a directive to separate the Remedy Development and >> Administrative functions. Basically, we have been instructed to come up >> with a way to ensure that no one person can make development changes and >> also be able to set up users accounts. We currently split the roles between >> two groups so that no one person is doing both, however, since the >> developers and admins have Administrator privileges, there is nothing >> stopping either from performing all functions. >> >> Does anyone else out there have a similar requirement? If so, can you >> share your solution? >> >> I am just not seeing a way to do this. Or maybe I just don't want to see >> the way. :) Seems to me both rolls need to have Administrator privileges to >> complete their tasks. >> >> Any insight is greatly appreciated. >> >> ARS 7.5 p7 >> MS SQL 2005 >> Windows 2003 SP2 >> >> Thanks, >> Todd Arner >> Great Lakes >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is >> intended >> only for the use of the recipient(s) named above, and may be legally >> privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you >> are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this >> communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have >> received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately >> and >> destroy or delete the original message and any copy of it from your computer >> system. If you have any questions concerning this message, please contact >> the >> sender. >> ================================================================================ >> >> _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ >> >> >> _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ >> > > > > -- > Patrick Zandi > > _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ > -- Warren R. Baltimore II Remedy Developer 410-533-5367 _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
