That's a good question Mark. I'm not aware of any differences that would make one more efficient than the other. Personally I prefer to use the "Commit Changes" as it seems cleaner to use this rather than one of many run process commands.
Rod Harris On 9 December 2011 04:51, Brittain, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > ** > > HI All,**** > > ** ** > > Commit Changes vs. PERFORM ACTION APPLY. Is one better to use than the > other on ARS 6.3?**** > > ** ** > > I have one active link that populates data from a SQL query and a second > active link to commit the changes. These were probably created under ARS 3 > or 4. The Commit Changes does the job but always looking to smart way to do > things.**** > > ** ** > > Thanks**** > > Mark **** > > ** ** > > *Mark Brittain* > > Remedy Developer**** > > *NaviSite – **A Time Warner Cable Company* > > [email protected]**** > > Office: 315-453-2912 x5335**** > > Mobile: 315-317-2897**** > > ** ** > > ------------------------------ > This e-mail is the property of NaviSite, Inc. It is intended only for the > person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that > is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. > Distribution or copying of this e-mail, or the information contained > herein, to anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. > _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
