That's a pretty generic inquiry. You should first define your recovery objectives and what level of investment you are willing to make, in terms of implementation time and cost. It is a compromise from that point forward to balance the objectives and cost. If you can define the objectives and the investment ceiling, you will get useful responses. Short of that you will receive a lot of responses that don't apply with the off chance that you will be able to use something someone sends because their assumptions were in-line with your reality.
When it comes to HA, options start cheap, but the cost ceiling can go very high, all depending on what you want to achieve. Regards, Axton Grams On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Bajwa, Ibrar <[email protected]>wrote: > ** > > Hello all,**** > > ** ** > > We are currently looking into implementing a disaster recovery process for > Remedy. We are considering all options and suggestions. **** > > ** ** > > Some background info:**** > > ** ** > > 2 environments, dev & prod**** > > All servers are VM’s**** > > AR 7.6.04**** > > ** ** > > If you have any questions or require any more info, do ask!**** > > ** ** > > > > Ibrar* *Bajwa > > Remedy Analyst > > > > Brookfield Corporate Operations > > Technology Services > > 1 Adelaide Street East, Suite 1400, Toronto, ON M5C 2V9 > > T 416.649.8249, F 416.649.8245 > > [email protected] > > > > [image: Brookfield Logo] > > > > View Important disclosures and information about our e-mail policies > here<http://www.brookfield.com/emaildisclaimer> > . > > > > _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
