JUST REMINISCING…

That project was 11 .5 years ago… I remember - because my son was just
learning to walk…

And -- what was special about that???

He was walking across a fairly large foyer of a very fancy building -- he
was walking towards a very large door to go outside.

About 8 misc people were watching to see if this little kid will make it
without falling…

He got to the door - and a very nice person opened it and smiled nicely -
and let my son through…

That person was Paul Allen…

(I have goosebumps remembering it)


-John



On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 1:16 PM, John Sundberg <[email protected]
> wrote:

> So weird - so unexpected -- that you really would not keep a map of (old
> name-> new name) when you go and rename your filters…
>
> (And -- it is not that you would obviously know that you messed stuff up
> either) -- as the system will keep working -- but - just be creating "wrong
> data"… Which -- is not necessarily found (even in a big system) until a
> week later…
>
> Hence -- restoring is not an option either…
>
>
> Hence -- the project I had.
>
>
> CONCLUSION: It is a bad design - a dangerous design...
>
>
>
> -John
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Joe Martin D'Souza <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> **
>>  I agree.. I remember discussing this exact same point a few months or
>> perhaps a year ago. Its weird to make a name of a workflow to be used as
>> ‘code’ to do a specific task.
>>
>> But while it is what it is, it would be nice to have a list of such
>> ‘special naming conventions’..
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>  *From:* John Sundberg <[email protected]>
>> *Sent:* Friday, April 06, 2012 1:52 PM
>> *Newsgroups:* public.remedy.arsystem.general
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: Filter names question - `!
>>
>> ** I think the convention should be "REMOVED"…
>>
>> Add a flag on Filter -- Run Immediately…
>>
>> Approx 10 years ago -- I was brought into a big telco project to "fix
>> it"….
>>
>> After a new developer went through and renamed filters/actlinks to meet a
>> nicer naming convention… (to work with BMCs new filtering based on COLON)
>>
>> Try -- troubleshooting that….
>>
>> Old name:
>>
>> mtc_FindIPAddress`!
>>
>> New name:
>>
>> MTC:IP:Find_Address
>>
>>
>> (in a haystack of 2000 filters -- that all got renamed)
>>
>> (OK - I am exaggerating the situation a bit -- but -- either way -- my
>> opinion it is TOO WEIRD to add something to a name - and now it works
>> different)
>>
>>
>> -John
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Joe Martin D'Souza <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> We are allowed that on Friday :-)
>>>
>>> This is an interesting thread though.. It would be nice to have a full
>>> list of all these small conventions that could affect functionality..
>>>
>>> Imagine fat fingering the keyboard (although that’s as likely to happen
>>> anytime too soon as as having a snow storm in the middle east) and naming a
>>> piece of workflow with these characters and have functionality affected,
>>> and not have a clue why..
>>>
>>> Joe
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message----- From: LJ LongWing
>>> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 12:30 PM Newsgroups:
>>> public.remedy.arsystem.general
>>>
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: Filter names question - `!
>>>
>>> Ah...yes, I'll agree that * in a workflow doesn't indicate anything then
>>> :)....mis-read the darn post :)
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
>>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe Martin D'Souza
>>> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 10:13 AM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: Filter names question - `!
>>>
>>> Dee was asking about the * in the beginning of workflow names.. That in
>>> front of workflow is more the work of a developer customizing an OTB
>>> app..
>>>
>>> While I was aware that the * at the end of field names was just a visual
>>> thing for bold fields, I wasn't aware it was because of the section 508
>>> compliance standards.. That’s a good to know and thanks for that info.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message----- From: LJ LongWing
>>> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 12:06 PM Newsgroups:
>>> public.remedy.arsystem.general
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: Filter names question - `!
>>>
>>> The * at the beginning of the field name is a Section 508 compliance
>>> thing...it designates to visually impaired people that the field is
>>> required
>>>
>>> http://www.uspto.gov/web/**offices/cio/s508/03web.htm<http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/cio/s508/03web.htm>
>>>
>>> search for the word 'asterisk'
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dee
>>> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 9:27 AM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: Filter names question - `!
>>>
>>> Thanks Joe,
>>>
>>> Like John in this post and Sam in "Suggestions" post last week,  are
>>> these
>>> commands/tricks written any where and are there more?
>>>
>>>
>>> Looking at System Forms/Workflow, do these mean anything or just name
>>> conventions?
>>>
>>> 1. (*)At the begin of Name of workflow, ex. (*TS-SI 100 Upper Server)
>>> 2. (~!) At the end of name of workflow, ex. (AP:Sig-RecentHistoryDate~!)
>>> 3. (`1)At the end of name of workflow, ex.  (XR:GetSchemaWorkflow1`1)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>  ______________________________**______________________________**
>>> ___________________
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
>>> attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> *John Sundberg*
>> Kinetic Data, Inc.
>> "Your Business. Your Process."
>> *WWRUG10 Best Customer Service/Support Award*
>> *WWRUG09 Innovator of the Year Award*
>> *
>> *
>> 651-556-0930 I [email protected]
>> www.kineticdata.com I community.kineticdata.com
>>  _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *John Sundberg*
> Kinetic Data, Inc.
> "Your Business. Your Process."
> *WWRUG10 Best Customer Service/Support Award*
> *WWRUG09 Innovator of the Year Award*
> *
> *
> 651-556-0930 I [email protected]
>  www.kineticdata.com I community.kineticdata.com
>
>
>
>


-- 

*John Sundberg*
Kinetic Data, Inc.
"Your Business. Your Process."
*WWRUG10 Best Customer Service/Support Award*
*WWRUG09 Innovator of the Year Award*
*
*
651-556-0930 I [email protected]
www.kineticdata.com I community.kineticdata.com

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to