What does it really matter what the number is? The content is what matters. We'll be told when they want us to know. That's been the mantra since I started using Remedy in 1995, don't bother asking ...we're not telling.
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Longwing, LJ CTR MDA/IC < [email protected]> wrote: > What I remember from that time is that 7.6.3 was supposed to be 8....but > they realigned things to internal numbering practices...and was originally > supposed to include overlays...but they couldn't get it hardened before > GA...so they released 7.6.3 without it....and then 'shortly' later released > 7.6.4 which was the 'finished product' that 7.6.3 was supposed to be... > > -----Original Message----- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe Martin D'Souza > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 12:58 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Next ARS version > > ** > > That’s weird.. did they call it a maintenance release? No way it wasn’t.. > With the introduction of something so foreign to the ARS as the overlays, > it can’t be considered a maintenance release.. It was a major release.. > > In my opinion, any release that changes the structure of the underlying > database IS NOT a maintenance release. Changes to the DB structure, should > be one of the several other criteria, that determines if a release ought to > be qualified as a major release.. > > If they had already changed the structure of the DB in 7.6.03, and then > leveraged that new structure in 7.6.04, then yes, it can be argued as a > maintenance release, but I do not think this was the case. The DB structure > was altered in 7.6.04 to accommodate the overlays feature, and not in > 7.6.03.. > > Joe > > From: Tauf Chowdhury <mailto:[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 10:25 AM > Newsgroups: public.remedy.arsystem.general > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Next ARS version > > ** > Personally, I think BMC needs to redefine its versioning criteria after > seeing what happened with 7.6.03 to 7.6.04. I still can't make sense of how > 04 was a "maintenance release." > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jun 24, 2012, at 11:11 AM, praveen kumar <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > ** > Yes..! next ARS release will be 8.0 confirmed by BMC. Loads of new > features and expectations. Fingers crossed for the upcoming release. > > Cheers.! > prawin > > > > > I think it was to be 7.7, but then BMC decided there are enough > new > > feature to call it 8.0. > > > > On 24/06/2012 12:22, Jose Huerta wrote: > > > ** I'm a bit confused about next version. > > > > > > Some people told me that it will be 7.7, but others say 8.0. > I'm sure > > > that you'll have the correct answer. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Jose Huerta > > > http://theremedyforit.com/ > > > _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ > > > > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org > > attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are" > > _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ > > _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ > > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org > attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are" > _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
