Hi,

I'm working on setting up a new environment for ARS 8 on a Windows Server
2008 platform (SQL Server db).  Windows Server is a new beast to me (have
always run on Unix before), so I'm just learning the various install
options/issues.  In considering the java install, one of the options the
java docs talk about is a private install vs. a public install:

Private Versus Public JRE

Installing the JDK also installs a private JRE and optionally a public
copy. The private JRE is required to run the tools included with the JDK.
It has no registry settings and is contained entirely in a jre directory
(typically at C:\Program Files\jdk1.7.0\jre) whose location is known only
to the JDK. On the other hand, the public JRE can be used by other Java
applications, is contained outside the JDK (typically at C:\Program
Files\Java\jre1.7.0), is registered with the Windows registry (at
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\JavaSoft), can be removed using Add/Remove
Programs, might be registered with browsers, and might have the
java.exefile copied to the Windows system directory (which would make
it the
default system Java platform).

Do I need the public copy to run ARS?  Seems like it would be cleaner and
easier to manage future upgrades without it.

For now I'm installing the AR server, but I suppose the same question will
apply when I get to the mid-tier.

Thanks for sharing your experience,

Thad

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to