What you are looking for is a combination of approval chain and SLA 
escalations.
It is not there out of the box. So what ever you end up doing is some 
flavor of custom workflow.
The minimum workflow I could think of is create group including all the 
managers as you mentioned. 
Write an SLA rule against status of the change ticket. 
Usually once all the approvals are done the ticket goes to scheduled.
So your SLA can trigger if the ticket status does not go to scheduled 
during certain time after implementation approvals started  and the action 
it does is to set the flag on some temp field on the change tkt.
Then you can have two filters trigger on that event
1. Sends a notification to CIO or Director
2. Adds an approval signature to change tkt for CIO or Directors. There are 
some command line options available to add approvers to change tkts..

Actually you can just do 1, as in many companies CIO and Directors do not 
even log into remedy.
Usually they reply to the  email requesting their approval with Approve or 
Reject CCing Change Manager or Process admin. 
You can have the system  create a worklog entry that CIO override the 
approval based on his reply to remedy inbox.
And the process admin or change manager can login  to remedy and overrides 
pending approvals. He could add a manual worklog entry that CIO approved it 
if the system did not create one.



>  
>
> Thanks in advance just for reading this message.  If you have any 
> suggestions other than building a custom app, they would be greatly 
> appreciated.
>
>  
>
> Thanks,
>
> * *
>
> *Shawn Pierson *
>
> Remedy Developer | Energy Transfer
>
>  
>  Private and confidential as detailed 
> here<http://www.sug.com/disclaimers/default.htm#Mail>. 
> If you cannot access hyperlink, please e-mail sender. 
> _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ 


_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to