Ravi,
Where do you see this recommendation? Unless you are running a sandbox or
demo virtual machine, running AR and DB on the same machine isn't
recommended.

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 1, 2012, at 12:30 PM, ravi rai <[email protected]> wrote:

**
Vikrant
You have mentioned  REMOTE SQL 2008 DB. That might be the cause. Setting a
remote DB is not recommended for ARS setup.

There are more than 10-12 known issues and defects on reporting for SP1 and
SP2
Using report cause CPU spike, Does not account maxGetList, large report
generation cause out of memory error, Null pointer exception, downloading
report is very slow etc etc  list is very big..... You might want to check
the Release doc specifically around reports.


Thanks
Ravi Rai


> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 02:38:17 -0400
> From: [email protected]
> Subject: ARS 7604 Custom App and Reporting Issues
> To: [email protected]
>
> hi Everyone,
>
> We are facing some issues in crystal report for one of our client. The
crystal report is a call details report with about 30 fields in it which
included about 10 formula fields.
>
> The issue we are facing is that it takes a lot of time to extract a
single report and at a time we can only extract report for a time span of
30 days if we increase the time span it just gets stuck and we get nothing
the user tool just gets stuck.
>
> The application is a complete custom application and we are not using
anything OOTB apart from foundation part(people form, user form etc).
> The AR architecture is such that we have only 1 application server (ARS
7.6.0.4 SP2) which is our reporting server as well. Then we have a remote
SQL 2008 DB and a stand alone MT ARS 7.6.0.4.
>
> The configurations of the above servers is as below
>
> ARS/Reporting Server = 32GB RAM 100Gb HDD 2.6Ghz dual core 2 processors.
> SQL or DB server = 16GB RAM 500GB HDD 2.6Ghz dual core 2 processors.
> MT Server = 16GB RAM 100GB HDD 2.6Ghz dual core 2 processors.
>
> Now there are few things that we plan to configure to improve performance
on the system and would like some opinion on the same from you guys so as
to what more can be done on the same.
>
> Things we plan to do :
>
> 1) Threads and queues to be configured : Gradually increase the number of
threads from the default value (not sure about the number)
> 2) Indexes : To set 6-7 fields as indexes on the form on which the
reports runs.
> 3) Disable unwanted escalation : Don't know if this will help but will
try to disable most of the unwanted OOTB escalations which we do not use.
> 4) MT JVM memory check : Its already set to max = 1024 MB not sure how
much can we increase it more.
> 5) Check for DB side configuration : This is something new we are trying
to find out things that we can configure on DB side to get better
performance.
>
> Also we think this all infrastructure being on cloud would make a
difference as well am I right?
>
> Thanks in advance for the replies.
>
> Regards,
> Vikrant
>
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
 _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to