I have to be the voice of dissent here. I actually like the documents. Granted, they were a BIG pain to install locally (which seems to be a need with my co-workers) just because of the size. And I found it amusing since I was looking at the files while they were being copied to the server and then POOF the css file must have gotten copied over.
Maybe I was looking at other documentation, but to be honest, we aren't building skyscrapers and having living documentation that is corrected when problems are found is something that I would consider to be an improvement. Rather than having to say, I know you read it in the documentation, but it is wrong and don't expect to see it change until the next version (if you are lucky). I think a living document is the correct direction to go in this case. Again, just my 2 scents. ;-) Brian Goralczyk Phone 574-643-1144 Email bgoralc...@gmail.com On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Patrick Zandi <remedy...@gmail.com> wrote: > I so wanted to say some need a snickers ! > Your such a diva when your hungry > > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org > attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are" > _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
