Yes that was the workaround on those earlier patches.. I had gotten around it 
the exact same way..

Joe


________________________________
 From: Steve Kallestad <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 2:52 PM
Subject: Re: Great...ANOTHER BUG
 

**
You can import them but you can't edit them.  I've run into this before when my 
menu was based on a selection value.

In the end, I just edited the def file directly and imported the menu.  XML def 
files are easier to understand if you haven't done it before.


On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Rick Cook <[email protected]> wrote:

** 
>That is how the existing menus work for Categorization and a dozen other 
>things.  How are they working and yours isn't?
>Rick
>On Mar 27, 2013 3:11 PM, "Grooms, Frederick W" <[email protected]> 
>wrote:
>
>Just to be clear (I hope)
>>
>>You have a field on a form (call it FormA) you want to put a menu on.  You 
>>want that menu to be dynamic based on another field (1000000099) on FormA
>>
>>Is the data for the menu also on FormA or on another form FormB?
>>If the data is on FormB:
>>   Does FormB also have a field 1000000099?  And if so, is it the same as the 
>>field on FormA?
>>
>>
>>Another possible thing I can think of...  Is the selection values and the 
>>alias values the same for the selection field (1000000099)?
>>
>>Fred
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
>>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matthew Perrault
>>Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 4:23 PM
>>To: [email protected]
>>Subject: Great...ANOTHER BUG
>>
>>**
>>Well,
>>You can't create dynamic menus in the new developer studio.
>>If you have a selection field you want to use in a menu in a dynamic fashion, 
>>you can't.
>>If field 1000000099 is a selection field with 4 values:
>>Hello (0)
>>World (1)
>>Today (2)
>>Tomorrow (3)
>>Then in the menu if you type $ 1000000099$ = 0
>>Developer studio changes that to $ 1000000099$ = "Yes"
>>Which results in the  error:
>>Incompatible data types for intended relational operation. (ARERR 313)
>>
>>Thanks BMC, what an astronomical step backwards.
>>
>>_______________________________________________________________________________
>>UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
>>"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
>>
_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ 

_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"

Reply via email to