Shawn:

I notice that no one is mentioning the Corporate ID field, which can very 
definitely uniquely identify customers with the same name and do cool things 
like help you turn up tickets for a given person after they've had a name 
and/or email address and/or login id change.  Is your ITSM installation making 
use of that field so that it might provide some value here?  (I'm assuming here 
that you'd probably have to modify the HPD:IncidentInterface_Create form to 
make use of it.)

Natalie Stroud
SAIC @ Sandia National Laboratories
ARS-ITSM Reporting Specialist
Albuquerque, NM USA
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
ITSM 7.6.04 SP2 - Windows 2003 - SQL Server 2008




From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe D'Souza
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 2:29 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Setting the Customer*+ on Incidents through a web 
service

**

I haven't used that particular web service designed for that form, but I'm 
familiar with that form and the web service, so that's the way I would go too. 
Or use the login name which is a guaranteed piece of unique information on 
CTM:People. If you notice, there is no unique index on the email address, so 
there is no guarantee that email addresses will continue to be unique, even if 
right now they are. I have seen small to even organizations where a group of 
people share the same email address if they are customer facing, e.g. 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> and do not have a 
specific individual email address.



If that might be a potential case in your case, I would stick more with the 
Remedy Login ID, which although it doesn't have a Unique Index defined on 
CTM:People or the User form, there are filter checks to prevent the creation of 
a duplicate Remedy Login ID. There is no such workflow for email addresses.



Joe

________________________________
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pierson, Shawn
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 3:49 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Setting the Customer*+ on Incidents through a web service

That's what I thought, thanks.  I will probably take a more robust look at that 
and add in the ability to search by username while I'm at it since that is also 
a unique value.

Thanks,

Shawn Pierson
Remedy Developer | Energy Transfer

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 2:47 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Setting the Customer*+ on Incidents through a web service

**
There's no data configuration for it. Requires adding the Internet E-mail field 
to the web service input mapping and then updating the filter on the Interface 
Create form to use it when retrieving the customer information.



Jason Bess
From: "Pierson, Shawn" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 8, 2013 2:34 PM
Subject: Setting the Customer*+ on Incidents through a web service

**
Good afternoon,

Perhaps this is just a limitation in my own thinking, but I have a few 
integrations using the HPD:IncidentInterface_Create form.  Since the company is 
growing, we are running into issues where we have people with the same name but 
are different people under different operating companies, but the way the web 
service works it picks the first People record with a matching name.  I have 
the user's email address and could probably obtain other information if 
necessary to make the name unique, but in looking at the BMC Remedy IT Service 
Management Integrations guide, I don't see where I can actually pass any of 
those fields.  Based on the documentation, it looks like the only things you 
can match on are the Last_Name and First_Name, and then return the first result.

How do those of you leveraging the web services or email templates get around 
this limitation, or is the documentation incorrect?  I am on 7.6.4 but this 
issue has been around since before the upgrade.

Thanks,

Shawn Pierson
Remedy Developer | Energy Transfer
Private and confidential as detailed 
here<http://www.energytransfer.com/mail_disclaimer.aspx>. If you cannot access 
hyperlink, please e-mail sender.
_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_

_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
Private and confidential as detailed 
here<http://www.energytransfer.com/mail_disclaimer.aspx>. If you cannot access 
hyperlink, please e-mail sender.
_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ _ARSlist: "Where 
the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"

Reply via email to