sounds good.. just asking.. for thoughts..
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Longwing, Lj <[email protected]> wrote: > ** > Patrick, > I have never heard of a requirement that all nodes of a server group must > be on the same architecture. Due to the fact that the server group is just > signaling communication between the servers, I don't see it as a problem. > The only time you would come against issues would be if your DB was > something not supported by all platforms, like SQL Server for example, but > as long as all nodes can connect to the DB, I can't see how it would be an > issue. > > > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 7:01 AM, patrick zandi <[email protected]>wrote: > >> ** >> Was wondering if anyone has made a server group of 2 servers same OS, and >> Architecture and 1 different. Possible impacts / problems, or is it in the >> docs not to do. which I did not notice. >> >> Scenario: 2 linux ARS servers in a group, add 1 windows ARS server and >> add to group. >> The windows server will be the Integration part / and reconciliation/ and >> admin / and for it to run specific jobs functions.. >> >> Requirement to run Windows Powershell scripts to do work on Exchange >> server farms from the 1 windows ARS server in the group, but the rest are >> linux. >> >> -- >> Patrick Zandi >> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ > > > _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ -- Patrick Zandi _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
